a. SecDef-approved standing rules of engagement (SROE) that implement the inherent right of self-defense and provide guidance for the application of force for mission accomplishment. b. Fundamental policies and procedures governing action to be taken by US force commanders during all military operations and contingencies as specified in paragraph 3. 2. Cancellation. CJCSI 3121.01, 1 October 1994, is canceled. 3. Applicability. ROE apply to US forces during military attacks against the United States and during all military operations, contingencies, and terrorist attacks occurring outside the territorial jurisdiction of the United States. The territorial jurisdiction of the United States includes the 50 states, the Commonwealths of Puerto Ri...
This book examines US recourse to military force in the post-9/11 era. In particular, it evaluates t...
The traditional view amongst some states is that the rules of engagement are not published beyond th...
Although the conflict formerly known as the “war on terror” is now in its eighth year, key legal iss...
This study analyzes the role and function of the rules on the use of force for military operations i...
The Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff\u27s Standing Rules of Engagement/StandingRules for the Us...
Within a broader discussion as to the place and role of self-defence within Rules of Engagement, thi...
Were the Charter a static instrument bound exclusively to the textually expressed intent of its draf...
The Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff\u27s Standing Rules of Engagement/Standing Rules for the U...
To make rules governing the use of the Armed Forces of the United States in the absence of a declara...
The thesis of this article argues that while the use of preemptive military strikes, now adopted by ...
When the United Nations (UN) Charter was adopted, it was generally considered to have outlawed war. ...
In March 2012, an atrocity was committed in two villages in the Kandahar Province of Afghanistan. On...
This paper explores the international law governing the use of force in the wake of conflicts in Kos...
Notwithstanding the strict restriction on the use of military force under Article 2(4) of the United...
Article 51 of the United Nations Charter preserves the right of nations to use military force in sel...
This book examines US recourse to military force in the post-9/11 era. In particular, it evaluates t...
The traditional view amongst some states is that the rules of engagement are not published beyond th...
Although the conflict formerly known as the “war on terror” is now in its eighth year, key legal iss...
This study analyzes the role and function of the rules on the use of force for military operations i...
The Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff\u27s Standing Rules of Engagement/StandingRules for the Us...
Within a broader discussion as to the place and role of self-defence within Rules of Engagement, thi...
Were the Charter a static instrument bound exclusively to the textually expressed intent of its draf...
The Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff\u27s Standing Rules of Engagement/Standing Rules for the U...
To make rules governing the use of the Armed Forces of the United States in the absence of a declara...
The thesis of this article argues that while the use of preemptive military strikes, now adopted by ...
When the United Nations (UN) Charter was adopted, it was generally considered to have outlawed war. ...
In March 2012, an atrocity was committed in two villages in the Kandahar Province of Afghanistan. On...
This paper explores the international law governing the use of force in the wake of conflicts in Kos...
Notwithstanding the strict restriction on the use of military force under Article 2(4) of the United...
Article 51 of the United Nations Charter preserves the right of nations to use military force in sel...
This book examines US recourse to military force in the post-9/11 era. In particular, it evaluates t...
The traditional view amongst some states is that the rules of engagement are not published beyond th...
Although the conflict formerly known as the “war on terror” is now in its eighth year, key legal iss...