When not enough time is available to fully explore a search tree, different algorithms will visit differ-ent leaves. Depth-first search and depth-bounded discrepancy search, for example, make opposite as-sumptions about the distribution of good leaves. Unfortunately, it is rarely clear a priori which al-gorithm will be most appropriate for a particular problem. Rather than fixing strong assumptions in advance, we propose an approach in which an al-gorithm attempts to adjust to the distribution of leaf costs in the tree while exploring it. By sacrificing completeness, such flexible algorithms can exploit information gathered during the search using only weak assumptions. As an example, we show how a simple depth-based additive cost model of ...