Add to ORKGoh an ys u tial increase in the number of systematic reviews pub-lished, constrained resources for new reviews, and the faced with decisions about whether and how to incorporate existing systematic reviews into new systematic reviews. Robinson et al. Systematic Reviews 2014, 3:6
Systematic reviews (SRs) should be up to date to maintain their importance in informing healthcare p...
Updating of systematic reviews is generally more efficient than starting all over again when new...
INTRODUCTION: The new call on independent research on drugs issued in October 2016 by the Italian M...
Systematic reviews—and research syntheses in general—are increasing as a form of research. As a resu...
Systematic reviews—and research syntheses in general—are increasing as a form of research. As a resu...
Updating systematic reviews is, in general, more efficient than starting afresh when new evidence em...
A literature review is where a solid research begins. However, it is likely that two researchers co...
Systematic reviews are a type of literature review in which authors systematically search for, criti...
Systematic reviews are difficult to keep up to date, but failure to do so leads to a decay in review...
Traditional approaches to reviewing literature may be susceptible to bias and result in incorrect de...
Systematic reviews are difficult to keep up to date, but failure to do so leads to a decay in review...
Updating of systematic reviews is generally more efficient than starting all over again when new evi...
Systematic review methods are developing rapidly, and most researchers would recognise their key met...
Synthesizing research evidence using systematic and rigorous methods has become a key feature of evi...
Many people consider systematic reviews to be the best source of information for making clinical and...
Systematic reviews (SRs) should be up to date to maintain their importance in informing healthcare p...
Updating of systematic reviews is generally more efficient than starting all over again when new...
INTRODUCTION: The new call on independent research on drugs issued in October 2016 by the Italian M...
Systematic reviews—and research syntheses in general—are increasing as a form of research. As a resu...
Systematic reviews—and research syntheses in general—are increasing as a form of research. As a resu...
Updating systematic reviews is, in general, more efficient than starting afresh when new evidence em...
A literature review is where a solid research begins. However, it is likely that two researchers co...
Systematic reviews are a type of literature review in which authors systematically search for, criti...
Systematic reviews are difficult to keep up to date, but failure to do so leads to a decay in review...
Traditional approaches to reviewing literature may be susceptible to bias and result in incorrect de...
Systematic reviews are difficult to keep up to date, but failure to do so leads to a decay in review...
Updating of systematic reviews is generally more efficient than starting all over again when new evi...
Systematic review methods are developing rapidly, and most researchers would recognise their key met...
Synthesizing research evidence using systematic and rigorous methods has become a key feature of evi...
Many people consider systematic reviews to be the best source of information for making clinical and...
Systematic reviews (SRs) should be up to date to maintain their importance in informing healthcare p...
Updating of systematic reviews is generally more efficient than starting all over again when new...
INTRODUCTION: The new call on independent research on drugs issued in October 2016 by the Italian M...