Un-Cartesian linguistics is a research program with the aim of rethinking the nature of grammar as a domain of scientific inquiry, raising new questions about the constitutive role of grammar in the organization of our (rational) minds and selves. It reformulates the ‘Cartesian ’ foundations of the modern Universal Grammar project, shifting emphasis away from the study of a domain-specific ‘innate ’ module separate from thought, to the study of a sapiens-specific mode of cognition conditioned by both grammati-cal and lexical organization, and thus a particular cognitive phenotype, which is uniquely also a linguistic one. The purpose of this position paper is to introduce and motivate this new concept in its various dimensions and in accessi...
Descartes argued that productivity, namely our ability to generate an unlimited number of new though...
There have been many criticisms of “nativism” in “Cartesian linguistics,” attacking positions that n...
How did grammar evolve? Perhaps a better way to ask the question is what kind of cognition is needed...
Un-Cartesian linguistics is a research program with the aim of rethinking the nature of grammar as a...
In spite of the fact that most models of language in cognitive science are naturalistic, many autho...
Hinzen lays out the platform of un-Cartesian linguistics, and the ramifications threaten widespread ...
This book discusses themes in the study of language and mind since the end of the sixteenth century ...
This paper dwells on some aspects of language, grammar in particular, through the prism of the funct...
This article is devoted to substantiating the cognitive-evolutionary theory of language within the f...
This study is a prolegomenon to a formal theory of the natural growth of conceptual and lexical fiel...
International audienceHow linguistics turned cognitive (again)This paper describes the birth of the ...
Of all the human sciences, linguistics has had perhaps the most success in pivoting itself towards t...
The chapter continues the discussion around the question of the essence of the hypothesis of linguis...
This study is a prolegomenon to a formal theory of the natural growth of conceptual and lexical fiel...
The standard view of classical cognitive science stated that cognition consists in the manipulation ...
Descartes argued that productivity, namely our ability to generate an unlimited number of new though...
There have been many criticisms of “nativism” in “Cartesian linguistics,” attacking positions that n...
How did grammar evolve? Perhaps a better way to ask the question is what kind of cognition is needed...
Un-Cartesian linguistics is a research program with the aim of rethinking the nature of grammar as a...
In spite of the fact that most models of language in cognitive science are naturalistic, many autho...
Hinzen lays out the platform of un-Cartesian linguistics, and the ramifications threaten widespread ...
This book discusses themes in the study of language and mind since the end of the sixteenth century ...
This paper dwells on some aspects of language, grammar in particular, through the prism of the funct...
This article is devoted to substantiating the cognitive-evolutionary theory of language within the f...
This study is a prolegomenon to a formal theory of the natural growth of conceptual and lexical fiel...
International audienceHow linguistics turned cognitive (again)This paper describes the birth of the ...
Of all the human sciences, linguistics has had perhaps the most success in pivoting itself towards t...
The chapter continues the discussion around the question of the essence of the hypothesis of linguis...
This study is a prolegomenon to a formal theory of the natural growth of conceptual and lexical fiel...
The standard view of classical cognitive science stated that cognition consists in the manipulation ...
Descartes argued that productivity, namely our ability to generate an unlimited number of new though...
There have been many criticisms of “nativism” in “Cartesian linguistics,” attacking positions that n...
How did grammar evolve? Perhaps a better way to ask the question is what kind of cognition is needed...