Abstract. Argumentative discussions are common in Web 2.0 applications, but the social Web still offers limited or no explicit support for argumentation. As Web 2.0 applications become more popular, modeling argumentation happening in these systems becomes important, to enable reuse and further understanding of on-line discussions. After reviewing four genres of online conversations–Web bulletin boards, Wiki talk pages, blog comments, and microblogs–and four current Web 2.0 argumentation systems, the paper suggests how Semantic Web technologies can be used to provide an interoperability layer for argumentation modeling across appli-cations
Argumentation, debate and discussion are key facets of human communication, shaping the way people f...
Students, researchers and professional analysts lack effective tools to make personal and collective...
Argumentation, debate and discussion are key facets of human communication, shaping the way people f...
Argumentative discussions are common in Web 2.0 applications, but the social Web still offers limite...
Argumentation represents the study of views and opinions that humans express with the goal of reachi...
Abstract. Argumentation represents the study of views and opinions that humans express with the goal...
This manuscript provides the research questions, proposed research plans, as well as expected contri...
Advanced argumentation support systems can rarely be found in today’s World Wide Web. One reason for...
This paper lays theoretical and software foundations for a World Wide Argument Web (WWAW): a large-s...
AbstractIn this paper, we present a software tool for ‘ArguBlogging’, which allows users to construc...
In this paper, we present a software tool for ‘ArguBlogging’, which allows users to construct debate...
AbstractThis paper lays theoretical and software foundations for a World Wide Argument Web (WWAW): a...
This paper lays theoretical and software foundations for a World Wide Argument Web (WWAW): a large-s...
This paper lays theoretical and software foundations for a World Wide Argument Web (WWAW): a large-s...
This paper lays theoretical and software foundations for a World Wide Argument Web (WWAW): a large-s...
Argumentation, debate and discussion are key facets of human communication, shaping the way people f...
Students, researchers and professional analysts lack effective tools to make personal and collective...
Argumentation, debate and discussion are key facets of human communication, shaping the way people f...
Argumentative discussions are common in Web 2.0 applications, but the social Web still offers limite...
Argumentation represents the study of views and opinions that humans express with the goal of reachi...
Abstract. Argumentation represents the study of views and opinions that humans express with the goal...
This manuscript provides the research questions, proposed research plans, as well as expected contri...
Advanced argumentation support systems can rarely be found in today’s World Wide Web. One reason for...
This paper lays theoretical and software foundations for a World Wide Argument Web (WWAW): a large-s...
AbstractIn this paper, we present a software tool for ‘ArguBlogging’, which allows users to construc...
In this paper, we present a software tool for ‘ArguBlogging’, which allows users to construct debate...
AbstractThis paper lays theoretical and software foundations for a World Wide Argument Web (WWAW): a...
This paper lays theoretical and software foundations for a World Wide Argument Web (WWAW): a large-s...
This paper lays theoretical and software foundations for a World Wide Argument Web (WWAW): a large-s...
This paper lays theoretical and software foundations for a World Wide Argument Web (WWAW): a large-s...
Argumentation, debate and discussion are key facets of human communication, shaping the way people f...
Students, researchers and professional analysts lack effective tools to make personal and collective...
Argumentation, debate and discussion are key facets of human communication, shaping the way people f...