Purpose: To evaluate the effect of comparison mammograms on accu-racy, sensitivity, specifi city, positive predictive value (PPV 1), and cancer detection rate (CDR) of screening mammogra-phy to determine the role played by identifi cation of change on comparison mammograms. Materials and Methods: This HIPAA-compliant and institutional review board– approved prospective study was performed with waiver of patient informed consent. A total of 1 157 980 screening mammograms obtained between 1994 and 2008 in 435 183 women aged at least 40 years were included. Radiologists recorded presence of comparison mammograms and change, if seen. Women were followed for 1 year to monitor cancer occurrence. Performance measurements were cal
PURPOSE: The effectiveness of supplemental screening ultrasound (US) was investigated in women ≥ 40 ...
Purpose: To evaluate the real-life performance of a breast cancer screening program for women with d...
AIM: To assess real-life reader performance as a function of both volume of mammograms read and read...
To evaluate the effect of comparison mammograms on accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, positive pred...
This study compares the clinical performance of three digital mammography system types in a breast c...
PURPOSE: To retrospectively evaluate the range of performance outcomes of the radiologist in an audi...
This study investigates the relationship between the number of screening mammograms read by radiolog...
Purpose: To report the impact of changing from screen-film mammography to digital mammography (DM) i...
Purpose To establish performance benchmarks for modern screening digital mammography and assess perf...
Background: In the United States, there are on average, 200,000 cases of breast cancer diagnosed eac...
Background Practice recommendations for mammography screening were issued by the U.S. Preven-tive Se...
Purpose: This paper provides pilot data from one Breast Screening Program on whether mammographers h...
Background: Previous studies have shown that the agree-ment among radiologists interpreting a test s...
OBJECTIVE: To compare breast cancer screening rates from the 1991 survey with data from 1987-88 for ...
Purpose To report the impact of changing from screen-film mammography to digital mammography (DM) in...
PURPOSE: The effectiveness of supplemental screening ultrasound (US) was investigated in women ≥ 40 ...
Purpose: To evaluate the real-life performance of a breast cancer screening program for women with d...
AIM: To assess real-life reader performance as a function of both volume of mammograms read and read...
To evaluate the effect of comparison mammograms on accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, positive pred...
This study compares the clinical performance of three digital mammography system types in a breast c...
PURPOSE: To retrospectively evaluate the range of performance outcomes of the radiologist in an audi...
This study investigates the relationship between the number of screening mammograms read by radiolog...
Purpose: To report the impact of changing from screen-film mammography to digital mammography (DM) i...
Purpose To establish performance benchmarks for modern screening digital mammography and assess perf...
Background: In the United States, there are on average, 200,000 cases of breast cancer diagnosed eac...
Background Practice recommendations for mammography screening were issued by the U.S. Preven-tive Se...
Purpose: This paper provides pilot data from one Breast Screening Program on whether mammographers h...
Background: Previous studies have shown that the agree-ment among radiologists interpreting a test s...
OBJECTIVE: To compare breast cancer screening rates from the 1991 survey with data from 1987-88 for ...
Purpose To report the impact of changing from screen-film mammography to digital mammography (DM) in...
PURPOSE: The effectiveness of supplemental screening ultrasound (US) was investigated in women ≥ 40 ...
Purpose: To evaluate the real-life performance of a breast cancer screening program for women with d...
AIM: To assess real-life reader performance as a function of both volume of mammograms read and read...