ANNALS OF ECONOMICS AND FINANCE 15-1, 135–160 (2014) Fiscal Decentralization and Public Services Provision in China

The last decade has witnessed a world trend of fiscal decentralization in the developing countries as an escape from inadequate growth and inefficient gov-ernance. With respect to China, fiscal decentralization has been a fundamental aspect of its transition to a market economy; and the country has made sub-stantial efforts to break down its highly centralized fiscal management system. China’s fiscal system currently has five levels — central, provincial, prefecture, county, and township. Sub-national governments have been assigned primary responsibility for public services provision and financing. China’s highly decen-tralized system could be a boon to managing service delivery, but the country’s crave for rapid economic growth in the last two decades has kept the reform of the public services on the fringes of political agenda. Under the current arrangements, public services are extensively decentralized with sub-national governments taking a much larger portion of expenditure responsibilities that are out of line with international practice. The over-devolution of spending responsibilities has resulted in insufficient financing and provision for core pub-lic services, and particularly a default in the delivery of vital services in many rural and poor localities. Further, in the absence of mechanisms to ensure national minimum service standards, the decentralized public services delivery system is faced with growing inequality across the country due to the widening regional disparity in economic development over the past decade. This paper reviews fiscal decentralization policies in China, identifies prominent issues in the current pubic service delivery system, and examines the deficiencies in the existing intergovernmental fiscal system that have contributed to insufficiency and inequality in public services provision. It advises plausible reform options to further national objectives