We use subjects ’ actions in modified dictator games to perform a within-subject classification of individuals into four different types of interdependent preferences: Selfish, Social Welfare maximizers, Inequity Averse and Competitive. We elicit beliefs about other subjects ’ actions in the same modified dictator games to test how much of the existent heterogeneity in others’ actions is known by subjects. We find that subjects with different interdependent preferences in fact have different beliefs about others ’ actions. In particular, Selfish individuals cannot conceive others being non-Selfish while Social Welfare maximizers are closest to the actual distribution of others ’ actions. We finally provide subjects with information on other...
This study explores the ways in which information about other individual's action affects one's own ...
This study explores the ways in which information about other individual's action affects one's own ...
Theoretical thesis.Bibliography: pages 99-104.1. Introduction and motivation -- 2. Literature review...
We use subjects ’ actions in modified dictator games to perform a within-subject classification of i...
We use subjects actions in modified dictator games to perform a within-subject classification of in...
We use subjects actions in modified dictator games to perform a within-subject classification ofind...
Using data from modified dictator games and a mixture-of-types estimation technique, we find a clear...
We compare behavior in modified dictator games with and without role uncertainty. Subjects choose be...
We experimentally study how redistribution choices are affected by positive and negative information...
We compare behavior in modified dictator games with and without role uncertainty. Subjects choose be...
We compare behavior in modified dictator games with and without role uncertainty. Subjects choose be...
We compare behavior in modified dictator games with and without role uncertainty. Subjectschoose bet...
We compare behavior in modified dictator games with and without role uncertainty. Subjects choose be...
We compare behavior in modified dictator games with and without role uncertainty. Costly surplus cre...
We study the impact of cognitive load in dictator games to test two conflicting views of moral behav...
This study explores the ways in which information about other individual's action affects one's own ...
This study explores the ways in which information about other individual's action affects one's own ...
Theoretical thesis.Bibliography: pages 99-104.1. Introduction and motivation -- 2. Literature review...
We use subjects ’ actions in modified dictator games to perform a within-subject classification of i...
We use subjects actions in modified dictator games to perform a within-subject classification of in...
We use subjects actions in modified dictator games to perform a within-subject classification ofind...
Using data from modified dictator games and a mixture-of-types estimation technique, we find a clear...
We compare behavior in modified dictator games with and without role uncertainty. Subjects choose be...
We experimentally study how redistribution choices are affected by positive and negative information...
We compare behavior in modified dictator games with and without role uncertainty. Subjects choose be...
We compare behavior in modified dictator games with and without role uncertainty. Subjects choose be...
We compare behavior in modified dictator games with and without role uncertainty. Subjectschoose bet...
We compare behavior in modified dictator games with and without role uncertainty. Subjects choose be...
We compare behavior in modified dictator games with and without role uncertainty. Costly surplus cre...
We study the impact of cognitive load in dictator games to test two conflicting views of moral behav...
This study explores the ways in which information about other individual's action affects one's own ...
This study explores the ways in which information about other individual's action affects one's own ...
Theoretical thesis.Bibliography: pages 99-104.1. Introduction and motivation -- 2. Literature review...