To provide guidance in handling concerns, complaints, or questions received regarding a research study involving human subjects GENERAL DESCRIPTION The right of research subjects to lodge a concern (e.g., allegation), complaint, or question and to be assured that the concern, complaint, or question is taken seriously and resolved in a timely manner is of prime importance. The Research Compliance Officer (RCO) or designee in the Office of Research Integrity (ORI) is responsible for investigating concerns, complaints, and questions from subjects and any improprieties involving investigators or their staff. The RCO or designee handles these issues in a timely manner, assuring protection of human subjects, and the IRB holds any violators accoun...
There is widespread agreement that the oversight of human subjects in research is inadequate to full...
All IRB communications regarding the approval, disapproval or modifications required to secure IRB a...
Activities such as continuous quality improvement, comparative effectiveness research, and electroni...
To describe the policies and procedures the Institutional Review Board (IRB) and the Office of Resea...
The IRB is a body of professional and lay persons who review all research studies from an institutio...
Office of Research Compliance and Assurance Spring 2019 Newsletter. Inside This Issue: Human Subje...
Researchers are responsible for communicating with their DOE Program Officer to ensure that all DOE ...
This conference is designed to aid the Clinical Research Professional’s understanding of current ‘Ho...
Researchers must protect the rights, welfare, and safety of human research subjects. Research: syste...
Institutional review boards (IRBs) protect the health, safety, and privacy of people participating i...
<p>*Survey respondents were instructed to “Assume in each case that identifiable data will be collec...
This article (1) examines the overall structure of regulatory research oversight in the United State...
Before the review process, researchers must be sure that their project is, in fact, human subjects r...
The history of health research, and concerns about the protection of human participants, dates back ...
This document summarizes the topics that need to be addressed in a proposal for human research -- co...
There is widespread agreement that the oversight of human subjects in research is inadequate to full...
All IRB communications regarding the approval, disapproval or modifications required to secure IRB a...
Activities such as continuous quality improvement, comparative effectiveness research, and electroni...
To describe the policies and procedures the Institutional Review Board (IRB) and the Office of Resea...
The IRB is a body of professional and lay persons who review all research studies from an institutio...
Office of Research Compliance and Assurance Spring 2019 Newsletter. Inside This Issue: Human Subje...
Researchers are responsible for communicating with their DOE Program Officer to ensure that all DOE ...
This conference is designed to aid the Clinical Research Professional’s understanding of current ‘Ho...
Researchers must protect the rights, welfare, and safety of human research subjects. Research: syste...
Institutional review boards (IRBs) protect the health, safety, and privacy of people participating i...
<p>*Survey respondents were instructed to “Assume in each case that identifiable data will be collec...
This article (1) examines the overall structure of regulatory research oversight in the United State...
Before the review process, researchers must be sure that their project is, in fact, human subjects r...
The history of health research, and concerns about the protection of human participants, dates back ...
This document summarizes the topics that need to be addressed in a proposal for human research -- co...
There is widespread agreement that the oversight of human subjects in research is inadequate to full...
All IRB communications regarding the approval, disapproval or modifications required to secure IRB a...
Activities such as continuous quality improvement, comparative effectiveness research, and electroni...