In this paper we compare the performance of two low latency hando protocols for MIPv4, Pre- and Post-Registration Hando. These mechanisms proposed by the IETF aim at improving the performance of Hierarchical Mobile IP with respect to hando latency and packet loss. We propose an analytical model to study the in uence of various system parameters on the performance of the two protocols, followed by a comparison of the two schemes. We describe several hando implementations over a wireless access based on the IEEE 802.11 standard and analyze them by means of an ns simulation. 1
International audienceIPv6 mobility management is one of the most challenging research topics for en...
We compare the performance of three handoff protocols, namely Mobile IP, Fast Handoff and mSCTP. Amo...
Typical PMIPv6 supports mobility management for the Mobile Host (MH) in localized domains over varia...
This paper investigates the performance of two low latency handoff protocols proposed by the IETF, n...
Abstract: Seamless communication is becoming the main aspect for the next generation of the mobile a...
Abstract—Micro-mobility protocols have been proposed to provide seamless local mobility support. Thi...
Mobile Ipv6 (MIPv6) is a protocol proposed for the future all-IP mobile Internet access. The goal of...
Abstract — In order to support mobile users, the basic Internet protocols have been extended with pr...
Seamless communication is becoming the main aspect for the next generation of the mobile and wireles...
International audienceOne serious concern in the ubiquitous networks is the seamless vertical handov...
Abstract-- Handover management is one of the most critical issues that mobility management protocols...
Mobile IPv6 (MIPv6) describes how mobile node can change its point of attachment from one access rou...
Mobile IPv6 (MIPv6) describes how mobile node can change its point of attachment from one access rou...
In this paper we discuss a methodology for performance evaluation of the solutions for vertical hand...
In this paper we discuss a methodology for performance evaluation of the solutions for vertical hand...
International audienceIPv6 mobility management is one of the most challenging research topics for en...
We compare the performance of three handoff protocols, namely Mobile IP, Fast Handoff and mSCTP. Amo...
Typical PMIPv6 supports mobility management for the Mobile Host (MH) in localized domains over varia...
This paper investigates the performance of two low latency handoff protocols proposed by the IETF, n...
Abstract: Seamless communication is becoming the main aspect for the next generation of the mobile a...
Abstract—Micro-mobility protocols have been proposed to provide seamless local mobility support. Thi...
Mobile Ipv6 (MIPv6) is a protocol proposed for the future all-IP mobile Internet access. The goal of...
Abstract — In order to support mobile users, the basic Internet protocols have been extended with pr...
Seamless communication is becoming the main aspect for the next generation of the mobile and wireles...
International audienceOne serious concern in the ubiquitous networks is the seamless vertical handov...
Abstract-- Handover management is one of the most critical issues that mobility management protocols...
Mobile IPv6 (MIPv6) describes how mobile node can change its point of attachment from one access rou...
Mobile IPv6 (MIPv6) describes how mobile node can change its point of attachment from one access rou...
In this paper we discuss a methodology for performance evaluation of the solutions for vertical hand...
In this paper we discuss a methodology for performance evaluation of the solutions for vertical hand...
International audienceIPv6 mobility management is one of the most challenging research topics for en...
We compare the performance of three handoff protocols, namely Mobile IP, Fast Handoff and mSCTP. Amo...
Typical PMIPv6 supports mobility management for the Mobile Host (MH) in localized domains over varia...