Abstract. In this paper, we seek to understand limits, a unifying notion that brings together the ideas of pullbacks, products, and equalizers. To do this, we will build up the basic framework of category theory, starting from the definition of a category. With this done, we will define pullbacks, products, and equalizers, and we will close this paper by showing two results: first, that having products and equalizers is equivalent to having pullbacks and a terminal object, and second, that having all finite limits is equivalent to havin
Let A′ be a category of input objects and A a category of output objects. Assume that A′ has limits ...
We call a finitely complete category diexact if every difunctional relation admits a pushout which i...
We consider various (free) completion processes: the exact completion and the regular completion of ...
Part 3: Contributed PapersInternational audienceIt is well-known that coequalisers and pushouts of s...
The behaviour and interaction of finite limits (products, pullbacks and equalisers) and colimits (co...
The main purpose of this article is to introduce the categorical concept of pullback in Mizar. In th...
ABSTRACT. Free regular and exact completions of categories with various ranks of weak limits are pre...
Category theory was invented as an abstract language for describing certain structures and construct...
To complete a category is to embed it into a larger one which is closed under a given type of limits...
AbstractWe characterize the categories with finite limits whose exact completions are toposes and di...
AbstractMany important 2-categories — such as Lex, Fib/B, elementary toposes and logical morphisms, ...
AbstractMany kinds of categorical structure require the existence of finite limits, of colimits of s...
We develop the theory of limits and colimits in $\infty$-categories within the synthetic framework o...
AbstractThe category à of relations in an Abelian category A is isomorphic to its own dual. This en...
Abstract. Motivated by applications to Mackey functors, Serge Bouc [Bo] character-ized pullback and ...
Let A′ be a category of input objects and A a category of output objects. Assume that A′ has limits ...
We call a finitely complete category diexact if every difunctional relation admits a pushout which i...
We consider various (free) completion processes: the exact completion and the regular completion of ...
Part 3: Contributed PapersInternational audienceIt is well-known that coequalisers and pushouts of s...
The behaviour and interaction of finite limits (products, pullbacks and equalisers) and colimits (co...
The main purpose of this article is to introduce the categorical concept of pullback in Mizar. In th...
ABSTRACT. Free regular and exact completions of categories with various ranks of weak limits are pre...
Category theory was invented as an abstract language for describing certain structures and construct...
To complete a category is to embed it into a larger one which is closed under a given type of limits...
AbstractWe characterize the categories with finite limits whose exact completions are toposes and di...
AbstractMany important 2-categories — such as Lex, Fib/B, elementary toposes and logical morphisms, ...
AbstractMany kinds of categorical structure require the existence of finite limits, of colimits of s...
We develop the theory of limits and colimits in $\infty$-categories within the synthetic framework o...
AbstractThe category à of relations in an Abelian category A is isomorphic to its own dual. This en...
Abstract. Motivated by applications to Mackey functors, Serge Bouc [Bo] character-ized pullback and ...
Let A′ be a category of input objects and A a category of output objects. Assume that A′ has limits ...
We call a finitely complete category diexact if every difunctional relation admits a pushout which i...
We consider various (free) completion processes: the exact completion and the regular completion of ...