When checking answers coming from automatic provers, or when skeptically integrating them into proof assistants, a major problem is the wide variety of formats of certificates, which forces to write lots of different checkers. In this paper, we propose to use the extended resolution as a common format for every propositional prover. To be able to do this, we detail two algorithms transforming proofs computed respectively by tableaux provers and provers based on BDDs into this format. Since this latter is already implemented for SAT solvers, it is now possible for the three most common propositional provers to share the same certificates.
AbstractA general approach to automated theorem proving for all first-order finite-valued logics tha...
This paper describes the integration of zChaff and MiniSat, currently two leading SAT solvers, with ...
Modern complete SAT solvers almost uniformly implement variations of the clause learning framework i...
International audienceWhen checking answers coming from automatic provers, or when skeptically integ...
Proving formulas in propositional logic can be done in different ways. Some of these are based on of...
http://www.tableaux11.unibe.ch/index.php?n=Site.ProceedingsInternational audienceTwo distinct algori...
International audienceThis paper describes two algorithms for the compression of propositional resol...
The program described in this document aims to enable an extensible theorem prover using the resolut...
A comparative study on the complexity of various procedures for proving that a set of clauses is co...
Abstract. Computer-generated proofs are usually difficult to grasp for a human reader. In this paper...
Abstract. We consider proof systems for effectively propositional logic. First, we show that proposi...
Integrating an SMT solver in a certified environment such as an LF-style proof assistant requires th...
Abstract. Interactive theorem provers can model complex systems, but require much effort to prove th...
Interactive theorem provers can model complex systems, but require much e#ort to prove theorems. Re...
There are many different ways of proving formulas in proposition logic. Many of these can easily be ...
AbstractA general approach to automated theorem proving for all first-order finite-valued logics tha...
This paper describes the integration of zChaff and MiniSat, currently two leading SAT solvers, with ...
Modern complete SAT solvers almost uniformly implement variations of the clause learning framework i...
International audienceWhen checking answers coming from automatic provers, or when skeptically integ...
Proving formulas in propositional logic can be done in different ways. Some of these are based on of...
http://www.tableaux11.unibe.ch/index.php?n=Site.ProceedingsInternational audienceTwo distinct algori...
International audienceThis paper describes two algorithms for the compression of propositional resol...
The program described in this document aims to enable an extensible theorem prover using the resolut...
A comparative study on the complexity of various procedures for proving that a set of clauses is co...
Abstract. Computer-generated proofs are usually difficult to grasp for a human reader. In this paper...
Abstract. We consider proof systems for effectively propositional logic. First, we show that proposi...
Integrating an SMT solver in a certified environment such as an LF-style proof assistant requires th...
Abstract. Interactive theorem provers can model complex systems, but require much effort to prove th...
Interactive theorem provers can model complex systems, but require much e#ort to prove theorems. Re...
There are many different ways of proving formulas in proposition logic. Many of these can easily be ...
AbstractA general approach to automated theorem proving for all first-order finite-valued logics tha...
This paper describes the integration of zChaff and MiniSat, currently two leading SAT solvers, with ...
Modern complete SAT solvers almost uniformly implement variations of the clause learning framework i...