Abstract. In this paper we investigate fair computations in the pi-calculus [25]. Following Costa and Stirling’s approach for CCS-like languages [10, 11], we consider a method to label process actions in order to filter out unfair computations. We contrast the existing fair-testing notion [35, 26] with those that naturally arise by imposing weak and strong fairness. This comparison provides insight about the expressiveness of the various ‘fair’ testing semantics and about their discriminating power. 1
In this paper we provide a simple characterization of (weak) fairness of components as defined by Co...
In this paper we provide a simple characterization of (weak) fairness of components as defined by Co...
This paper contrasts two important features of parallel system computations: fairness and timing. Th...
In this paper we investigate fair computations in the pi-calculus. FollowingCosta and Stirling's app...
In this paper, we define fair computations in the π-calculus [18]. We follow Costa and Stirling’s ap...
International audienceIn this paper we investigate fair computations in the $\pi$-calculus \cite{MPW...
In this paper, we define fair computations in the π-calculus [18]. We follow Costa and Stirling’s ap...
AbstractIn this paper, we define fair computations in the π-calculus [Milner, R., Parrow, J. & Walke...
AbstractWe examine the issue of weak and strong fairness in the framework of Milner's CCS. Our appro...
AbstractIn this paper we provide a simple characterization of (weak) fairness of components as defin...
AbstractThis paper describes a general framework for modeling fairness for communicating processes, ...
In previous work with Pous, we defined a semantics for CCS which may both beviewed as an innocent fo...
AbstractWe construct several denotational semantics for communicating processes that incorporate ass...
AbstractIn this paper we provide a simple characterization of (weak) fairness of components as defin...
Fairness of a program execution, c, usually expresses that all objects which are sufficiently often ...
In this paper we provide a simple characterization of (weak) fairness of components as defined by Co...
In this paper we provide a simple characterization of (weak) fairness of components as defined by Co...
This paper contrasts two important features of parallel system computations: fairness and timing. Th...
In this paper we investigate fair computations in the pi-calculus. FollowingCosta and Stirling's app...
In this paper, we define fair computations in the π-calculus [18]. We follow Costa and Stirling’s ap...
International audienceIn this paper we investigate fair computations in the $\pi$-calculus \cite{MPW...
In this paper, we define fair computations in the π-calculus [18]. We follow Costa and Stirling’s ap...
AbstractIn this paper, we define fair computations in the π-calculus [Milner, R., Parrow, J. & Walke...
AbstractWe examine the issue of weak and strong fairness in the framework of Milner's CCS. Our appro...
AbstractIn this paper we provide a simple characterization of (weak) fairness of components as defin...
AbstractThis paper describes a general framework for modeling fairness for communicating processes, ...
In previous work with Pous, we defined a semantics for CCS which may both beviewed as an innocent fo...
AbstractWe construct several denotational semantics for communicating processes that incorporate ass...
AbstractIn this paper we provide a simple characterization of (weak) fairness of components as defin...
Fairness of a program execution, c, usually expresses that all objects which are sufficiently often ...
In this paper we provide a simple characterization of (weak) fairness of components as defined by Co...
In this paper we provide a simple characterization of (weak) fairness of components as defined by Co...
This paper contrasts two important features of parallel system computations: fairness and timing. Th...