Add to ORKGProponents of Bayesian confirmation theory believe that they have the solution to a significant, recalcitrant problem in philosophy of science. It is the identification of the logic that governs evidence and its inductive bearing in science. That is the logic that lets us say that our catalog of planetary observations strongly confirm
Book review of Paul Horwich, Probability and Evidence (Cambridge Philosophy Classics edition), Cambr...
We present a conservative extension of a Bayesian account of confirmation that can deal with the pro...
Crupi et al. ([2008]) propose a generalization of Bayesian confirmation theory that they claim to ad...
Proponents of Bayesian confirmation theory believe that they have the solution to a significant, rec...
Proponents of Bayesian confirmation theory believe that they have the solution to a significant, rec...
Bayesian epistemology postulates a probabilistic analysis of many sorts of ordinary and scientific r...
An account of confirmation should seek to explain how to confirm theories, but because a\ud theory c...
Peter Brössel and Franz Huber in 2015 argued that the Bayesian concept of confirmation had no use. I...
The aim of this thesis essay is to show that Bayesian confirmation theory can be used instead of the...
Any theory of confirmation must answer the following question: what is the purpose of its conception...
Bayesian confirmation theory is a leading theory to decide the confirmation/refutation of a hypothes...
Philosophically, one of the most important questions in the enterprise termed confirmation theory is...
Kevin T. Kelly and Clark Glymour. Why Bayesian Confirmation Does Not Capture the Logic of Scientific...
This paper proposes a framework for representing in Bayesian terms the idea that analogical argument...
Any theory of confirmation must answer the following question: what is the purpose of its conception...
Book review of Paul Horwich, Probability and Evidence (Cambridge Philosophy Classics edition), Cambr...
We present a conservative extension of a Bayesian account of confirmation that can deal with the pro...
Crupi et al. ([2008]) propose a generalization of Bayesian confirmation theory that they claim to ad...
Proponents of Bayesian confirmation theory believe that they have the solution to a significant, rec...
Proponents of Bayesian confirmation theory believe that they have the solution to a significant, rec...
Bayesian epistemology postulates a probabilistic analysis of many sorts of ordinary and scientific r...
An account of confirmation should seek to explain how to confirm theories, but because a\ud theory c...
Peter Brössel and Franz Huber in 2015 argued that the Bayesian concept of confirmation had no use. I...
The aim of this thesis essay is to show that Bayesian confirmation theory can be used instead of the...
Any theory of confirmation must answer the following question: what is the purpose of its conception...
Bayesian confirmation theory is a leading theory to decide the confirmation/refutation of a hypothes...
Philosophically, one of the most important questions in the enterprise termed confirmation theory is...
Kevin T. Kelly and Clark Glymour. Why Bayesian Confirmation Does Not Capture the Logic of Scientific...
This paper proposes a framework for representing in Bayesian terms the idea that analogical argument...
Any theory of confirmation must answer the following question: what is the purpose of its conception...
Book review of Paul Horwich, Probability and Evidence (Cambridge Philosophy Classics edition), Cambr...
We present a conservative extension of a Bayesian account of confirmation that can deal with the pro...
Crupi et al. ([2008]) propose a generalization of Bayesian confirmation theory that they claim to ad...