Now this paper may seem a bit out of place in a publication on electoral strategies. The Iraq War enjoyed wide support in the United States and, to a lesser extent, in the United Kingdom for only a short period of time. However, in spite of all the controversies related to the war, both George W. Bush in 2004 and Tony Blair in 2005 secured re-election. Blair was even able to call early elections. In both cases, they presented the threat of Iraqi dictator, Saddam Hussein, in its worst possible light, using exaggeration and insinuations. They did this in a number of, often highly dubious ways, but one of the most important was through their rhetoric. Obviously, each man employs a staff of speech writers and so much – if not most – of what the...
President Bush has been accused by some in the popular press of lying in his arguments for taking th...
Blair sent British troops to join U.S. forces in the invasion of Iraq in 2003 at great political cos...
After War was published five years too late. Had the book been in print in 2003—and had George W. Bu...
National audienceThe Iraq War enjoyed wide support in the United States and, to a lesser extent, in ...
NoThis volume explores in close detail the events and factors leading up to the second Gulf War in 2...
The purpose of this article is to examine the extent to which the management system and foreign poli...
In December 2009 Tony Blair indicated that he would have pursued a policy of intervention in Iraq re...
The George W. Bush administration invaded Iraq in 2003, capitalizing on the public fear and paranoia...
261 p.Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 2008.This study analyzes rationale...
This dissertation focuses on processes that may explain the influence of presidential rhetoric and t...
ArticleThis paper argues that the effects of war as a performance issue in elections are different f...
This article focuses on rhetorical continuity and shifts in the use of the genre of Amer­...
The purpose of the paper is to determine the most influential political advisors in the formulation ...
Review of The War Over Iraq: Saddam\u27s Tyranny and America\u27s Mission. By Lawrence F. Kaplan and...
On 20 September 2001, the former US President, George W. Bush, declared what is now widely, and argu...
President Bush has been accused by some in the popular press of lying in his arguments for taking th...
Blair sent British troops to join U.S. forces in the invasion of Iraq in 2003 at great political cos...
After War was published five years too late. Had the book been in print in 2003—and had George W. Bu...
National audienceThe Iraq War enjoyed wide support in the United States and, to a lesser extent, in ...
NoThis volume explores in close detail the events and factors leading up to the second Gulf War in 2...
The purpose of this article is to examine the extent to which the management system and foreign poli...
In December 2009 Tony Blair indicated that he would have pursued a policy of intervention in Iraq re...
The George W. Bush administration invaded Iraq in 2003, capitalizing on the public fear and paranoia...
261 p.Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 2008.This study analyzes rationale...
This dissertation focuses on processes that may explain the influence of presidential rhetoric and t...
ArticleThis paper argues that the effects of war as a performance issue in elections are different f...
This article focuses on rhetorical continuity and shifts in the use of the genre of Amer­...
The purpose of the paper is to determine the most influential political advisors in the formulation ...
Review of The War Over Iraq: Saddam\u27s Tyranny and America\u27s Mission. By Lawrence F. Kaplan and...
On 20 September 2001, the former US President, George W. Bush, declared what is now widely, and argu...
President Bush has been accused by some in the popular press of lying in his arguments for taking th...
Blair sent British troops to join U.S. forces in the invasion of Iraq in 2003 at great political cos...
After War was published five years too late. Had the book been in print in 2003—and had George W. Bu...