[PRELIMINARY VERSION] This paper examines the e¤ect of debt and limited liability on investment timing in a duopoly with aggregate demand uncertainty and irreversible investment. Two patterns of investment emerge, depending on the parameter values and debt-levels. If debt levels of the competitors are su¢ciently di¤erent, an increase in debt delays investment. As debt-levels become more homogeneous, a race for market shares begins, as …rms wish to commit to not quitting the market …rst in adverse states. Moreover, …rms may engage in predatory investment, if the competitor has a comparably high debt burden. Therefore, debt has a strategic disadvantage. So this paper can explain both the relative low debt-ratios observed in most industries an...
This paper examines a firm’s debt level, investment timing, and investment scale choices in a contin...
SOM-Theme E: Financial markets and institutions Wanzenried (2003, International Journal of Industria...
In a seminal paper Brander and Lewis (Am Econ Rev 76:956–970, 1986) show that oligopolistic firms wi...
This paper examines the e¤ect of debt and limited liability on investment timing in a duopoly with a...
This paper investigates firm values and investment strategies (investment, coupon, and default timin...
In this paper we examine a new effect of risky debt on a firm’s investment strategy. We call this ef...
This paper shows that obligations from debt hinder tacit collusion if equity owners are protected by...
This paper derives the firm value and the investment strategy (investment timing, debt financing, le...
This paper investigates the strategic role of debt in a duopoly in which firms eventually have to le...
This paper investigates the strategic role of debt in a duopoly in which firms eventually have to le...
This paper studies the relationship between debt-financing and the timing of investment, under asymm...
This paper argues that the strategic use of debt favours the revelation of information in dynamic ad...
Recent empirical literature on the interaction between capital structure, investment, and product ma...
This paper examines the effect of debt and liquidity on corporate investment in a continuous-time dy...
This paper presents a model of predation based on reputational differences between the entrant and a...
This paper examines a firm’s debt level, investment timing, and investment scale choices in a contin...
SOM-Theme E: Financial markets and institutions Wanzenried (2003, International Journal of Industria...
In a seminal paper Brander and Lewis (Am Econ Rev 76:956–970, 1986) show that oligopolistic firms wi...
This paper examines the e¤ect of debt and limited liability on investment timing in a duopoly with a...
This paper investigates firm values and investment strategies (investment, coupon, and default timin...
In this paper we examine a new effect of risky debt on a firm’s investment strategy. We call this ef...
This paper shows that obligations from debt hinder tacit collusion if equity owners are protected by...
This paper derives the firm value and the investment strategy (investment timing, debt financing, le...
This paper investigates the strategic role of debt in a duopoly in which firms eventually have to le...
This paper investigates the strategic role of debt in a duopoly in which firms eventually have to le...
This paper studies the relationship between debt-financing and the timing of investment, under asymm...
This paper argues that the strategic use of debt favours the revelation of information in dynamic ad...
Recent empirical literature on the interaction between capital structure, investment, and product ma...
This paper examines the effect of debt and liquidity on corporate investment in a continuous-time dy...
This paper presents a model of predation based on reputational differences between the entrant and a...
This paper examines a firm’s debt level, investment timing, and investment scale choices in a contin...
SOM-Theme E: Financial markets and institutions Wanzenried (2003, International Journal of Industria...
In a seminal paper Brander and Lewis (Am Econ Rev 76:956–970, 1986) show that oligopolistic firms wi...