A rebate subsidy of rate sr is functionally equivalent to a matching subsidy of rate sm = sr/(1- sr). Other things equal, an individual should respond identically to the two subsidies. We test the effect on charitable giving of the framing of a subsidy as a rebate or as a match. Subjects make a series of 'dictator ' allocation decisions, dividing an endowment between themselves and their chosen charities. Allocation decisions vary by the endowment level, the net price of giving, and the form of the subsidy. We find that contributions are significantly higher with matching subsidies than with rebate subsidies. *- Thanks to Jim Andreoni, Lise Vesterlund, Robert Sugden and an anonymous referee for comments and suggestions. We thank S...
Subsidizing charitable giving, for example, for victims of natural disasters, is very popular, not o...
Matching grants are a prevalent mechanism for funding environmental, conservation, and natural resou...
We conducted a natural field experiment to further our understanding of the economics of charity. Us...
This paper replicates and refines the finding that subsidies for charitable contributions of a rebat...
An influential result in the literature on charitable giving is that matching subsidies dominate reb...
Abstract: We report the results of a field experiment conducted in conjunction with a mailed fundrai...
Existing evidence from laboratory experiments finds that a match is likely to increase charitable do...
An influential result in the literature on charitable giving is that matching subsidies dominate reb...
This paper uses experimental methods to investigate further the effects of subsidy schemes on charit...
We use a survey-based approach to compare the effects of alternative forms of tax relief on donation...
We examine the charitable giving decisions of donors under two subsidy mechanisms, rebate and matchi...
This paper uses a survey-based approach to test alternative methods of channeling tax relief to dono...
Field experiment, Rebate subsidy, Matching subsidy, Charitable giving, C93, D64, H41, L3,
This study uses a Japanese nationwide sample and experimentally compares rebate and matching, both o...
This paper provides a synthesis of the experimental literature on matching subsidies in the context ...
Subsidizing charitable giving, for example, for victims of natural disasters, is very popular, not o...
Matching grants are a prevalent mechanism for funding environmental, conservation, and natural resou...
We conducted a natural field experiment to further our understanding of the economics of charity. Us...
This paper replicates and refines the finding that subsidies for charitable contributions of a rebat...
An influential result in the literature on charitable giving is that matching subsidies dominate reb...
Abstract: We report the results of a field experiment conducted in conjunction with a mailed fundrai...
Existing evidence from laboratory experiments finds that a match is likely to increase charitable do...
An influential result in the literature on charitable giving is that matching subsidies dominate reb...
This paper uses experimental methods to investigate further the effects of subsidy schemes on charit...
We use a survey-based approach to compare the effects of alternative forms of tax relief on donation...
We examine the charitable giving decisions of donors under two subsidy mechanisms, rebate and matchi...
This paper uses a survey-based approach to test alternative methods of channeling tax relief to dono...
Field experiment, Rebate subsidy, Matching subsidy, Charitable giving, C93, D64, H41, L3,
This study uses a Japanese nationwide sample and experimentally compares rebate and matching, both o...
This paper provides a synthesis of the experimental literature on matching subsidies in the context ...
Subsidizing charitable giving, for example, for victims of natural disasters, is very popular, not o...
Matching grants are a prevalent mechanism for funding environmental, conservation, and natural resou...
We conducted a natural field experiment to further our understanding of the economics of charity. Us...