Much of the commentary on the new pension reform law suggests that it will be deleterious to defined benefit plans. We describe the economic policy background leading to the new law, the law’s main funding provisions, and analyze the volatility of required minimum contributions, leading us to the opposite conclusion. The new law should improve benefit security, reduce contribution volatility, and encourage responsible management and creative plan design, thereby improving the environment in which defined benefit plans are sponsored by employers and retirement benefits are earned by workers
This Article considers the historical basis for the shift from defined benefit plans to defined cont...
Since about 1980, the proportion of workers who participate in employer-sponsored retirement plans h...
In the context of the current debate surrounding the reform of most social security systems, this pa...
Much of the commentary on the new pension reform law suggests that it will be deleterious to defined...
About half of all workers in the United States participate in an employer-sponsored retirement plan ...
Under the traditional approach to defined benefit plans, well-intended disciplinary and regulatory r...
Employers have moved from traditional pension plans to cash balance and other alternative defined be...
Unless defined benefit pension plans are managed much better and more cost-effectively, they will be...
Defined-benefit pension plans do not offer complete security; there are policy alternatives that wou...
A letter report issued by the General Accounting Office with an abstract that begins "Proposals to e...
In the face of corporate bankruptcies, the Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation (“PBGC”) assures wor...
Federal law both cultivates and regulates employer-sponsored pension plans in the United States. Som...
Defined benefit (DB) plans have been applauded as the mainstay of the US pension system for many yea...
This paper explores the shift from defined benefit to defined contribution pension plans when the pa...
The dominant story in the pension world for much of the past decade has been the shift in coverage f...
This Article considers the historical basis for the shift from defined benefit plans to defined cont...
Since about 1980, the proportion of workers who participate in employer-sponsored retirement plans h...
In the context of the current debate surrounding the reform of most social security systems, this pa...
Much of the commentary on the new pension reform law suggests that it will be deleterious to defined...
About half of all workers in the United States participate in an employer-sponsored retirement plan ...
Under the traditional approach to defined benefit plans, well-intended disciplinary and regulatory r...
Employers have moved from traditional pension plans to cash balance and other alternative defined be...
Unless defined benefit pension plans are managed much better and more cost-effectively, they will be...
Defined-benefit pension plans do not offer complete security; there are policy alternatives that wou...
A letter report issued by the General Accounting Office with an abstract that begins "Proposals to e...
In the face of corporate bankruptcies, the Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation (“PBGC”) assures wor...
Federal law both cultivates and regulates employer-sponsored pension plans in the United States. Som...
Defined benefit (DB) plans have been applauded as the mainstay of the US pension system for many yea...
This paper explores the shift from defined benefit to defined contribution pension plans when the pa...
The dominant story in the pension world for much of the past decade has been the shift in coverage f...
This Article considers the historical basis for the shift from defined benefit plans to defined cont...
Since about 1980, the proportion of workers who participate in employer-sponsored retirement plans h...
In the context of the current debate surrounding the reform of most social security systems, this pa...