Futurological aspects of globalisation

The author examines futurological aspects of globalization having in mind various models of historical processes. He describes the changes as "futuroshock", thus presenting a dilemma whether the changes are only a momentum or a pre-planned concept. He especially stresses the Toffler’s conclusion that turns a new page in futurology - examining the dangers that follow the changes. According to him, predictions are made with the help of practically all the sciences in two basic directions: exploratory and normative. In his work the author considers the problem of the future not having perspective as a sequel to the present. The idea to build the world as a dualistic society of the "golden billion" and the exploited crowd is but new kind of fascism. In his opinion it is necessary to answer the question of who will indicate the qualitatively distinctive future and by which means this will be achieved. The traditional western science considers an anomaly everything that deviates a bit from it. Such a scientific paradigm projects conflicts, war, violence, which was the case in Yugoslavia, Iraq, Afghanistan, Libya, Syria etc. The author asserts three hypotheses of the possible future world order, while noticing that globalization transforms the whole regions into neo-totalitarian version of the order that spreads in concentric circles on the most of the world. According to the author, global totalitarian government is responsible for dual moral and double standards that provide limitless freedom for themselves and just the opposite for others. Within the given context, the conditions are being created on the East for a unique bloc that will consist of Chinese, Russian and Hindu-Buddhist civilization. This will serve as an alternative to the aggressive West