Many judgmental biases are thought to be the product of insuffi-cient adjustment from an initial anchor value. Nearly all exist-ing evidence of insufficient adjustment, however, comes from an experimental paradigm that evidence indicates does not involve adjustment at all. In this article, the authors first provide fur-ther evidence that some kinds of anchors (those that are self-generated and known to be incorrect but close to the correct answer) activate processes of adjustment, whereas others (uncer-tain anchors provided by an external source) do not. It is then shown that adjustment from self-generated anchors does indeed tend to be insufficient, both by comparing the estimates of partici-pants starting from different anchor values and ...
Results of 3 studies support the notion that anchoring is a special case of semantic priming; specif...
Anchoring, whereby judgments assimilate to previously considered standards, is one of the most relia...
How do we judge others’ emotions? A standard account of emotion judgments is that we can accurately ...
ABSTRACT—Oneway tomake judgments under uncertainty is to anchor on information that comes to mind an...
Abstract—People’s estimates of uncertain quantities are commonly influenced by irrelevant values. Th...
Although the anchoring effect is one of the most reliable results of experimental psychology, resear...
Ego depletion is a state in which people prefer to avoid mental effort, therefore possibly leading t...
Increasing accuracy motivation (e.g., by providing monetary incentives for accuracy) often fails to ...
An assimilation of an estimate towards a previously considered standard is defined as judgmental anc...
Anchoring is a judgmental bias that final judgments are assimilated toward the starting point of the...
People can easily infer the thoughts and feelings of others from brief descriptions of scenarios. Bu...
Two experiments examined the impact of financial incentives and forewarnings on judgmental anchoring...
Anchoring – the tendency for recently seen numbers to affect estimates – is a robust bias affecting ...
Recent research suggests that an attitude change perspective on anchoring offers important supplemen...
2nd place in the field of Psychology at the Denman Undergraduate Research ForumNumerical Anchoring o...
Results of 3 studies support the notion that anchoring is a special case of semantic priming; specif...
Anchoring, whereby judgments assimilate to previously considered standards, is one of the most relia...
How do we judge others’ emotions? A standard account of emotion judgments is that we can accurately ...
ABSTRACT—Oneway tomake judgments under uncertainty is to anchor on information that comes to mind an...
Abstract—People’s estimates of uncertain quantities are commonly influenced by irrelevant values. Th...
Although the anchoring effect is one of the most reliable results of experimental psychology, resear...
Ego depletion is a state in which people prefer to avoid mental effort, therefore possibly leading t...
Increasing accuracy motivation (e.g., by providing monetary incentives for accuracy) often fails to ...
An assimilation of an estimate towards a previously considered standard is defined as judgmental anc...
Anchoring is a judgmental bias that final judgments are assimilated toward the starting point of the...
People can easily infer the thoughts and feelings of others from brief descriptions of scenarios. Bu...
Two experiments examined the impact of financial incentives and forewarnings on judgmental anchoring...
Anchoring – the tendency for recently seen numbers to affect estimates – is a robust bias affecting ...
Recent research suggests that an attitude change perspective on anchoring offers important supplemen...
2nd place in the field of Psychology at the Denman Undergraduate Research ForumNumerical Anchoring o...
Results of 3 studies support the notion that anchoring is a special case of semantic priming; specif...
Anchoring, whereby judgments assimilate to previously considered standards, is one of the most relia...
How do we judge others’ emotions? A standard account of emotion judgments is that we can accurately ...