This essay examines the issue of the order of writing of the four Gospels in the New Testament canon. Procedurally, it discusses the emergence of the fourfold Gospel tradition, the Synoptic Problem and how it has been approached in history. The essay argues in favor of the Clementine or Two-Gospel Hypothesis position. An analysis of Matthew 10:5-23 functions as an illustration of the value of this Hypothesis for understanding the text and seeing its value for the life of faith
This thesis compares the relative plausibility of three contemporary Synoptic Gospel source critical...
This paper grows out of research done for reasons quite removed investigating the synoptic problem, ...
This essay argues that the Johannine “colophons” of John 20:30–31 and 21:24–25 support the argument ...
This essay examines the issue of the order of writing of the four Gospels in the New Testament canon...
In New Testament studies, the gospels of Matthew, Mark and Luke are known as the synoptic gospels. T...
New Testament scholars have for centuries posited different solutions to the Synoptic Problem. Recen...
New Testament scholars have for centuries posited different solutions to the Synoptic Problem. Recen...
Two Gospels From One examines the Synoptic Problem by using principles of textual criticism. Widely ...
The question of how the Gospels of Matthew, Mark, and Luke relate to each other has become the subje...
Extending an earlier simultaneous comparison of the three Synoptic Gospels to determine the probabil...
In Robert H. Stein’s work, Studying the Synoptic Gospels Origin and Interpretation, he discusses his...
Dr. Scaer explains why the gospels don\u27t say the exact same things.https://scholar.csl.edu/ccntov...
The Synoptic Problem is a puzzle that scholars have desired to solve since the 18th century. The dis...
Thesis (M.A.)--Boston University, 1940There is one main purpose in this study. This purpose is the c...
Reviewed Book: Orchard, Bernard. The Order of the Synoptics: Why Three Synoptic Gospels?. Macon, Ga:...
This thesis compares the relative plausibility of three contemporary Synoptic Gospel source critical...
This paper grows out of research done for reasons quite removed investigating the synoptic problem, ...
This essay argues that the Johannine “colophons” of John 20:30–31 and 21:24–25 support the argument ...
This essay examines the issue of the order of writing of the four Gospels in the New Testament canon...
In New Testament studies, the gospels of Matthew, Mark and Luke are known as the synoptic gospels. T...
New Testament scholars have for centuries posited different solutions to the Synoptic Problem. Recen...
New Testament scholars have for centuries posited different solutions to the Synoptic Problem. Recen...
Two Gospels From One examines the Synoptic Problem by using principles of textual criticism. Widely ...
The question of how the Gospels of Matthew, Mark, and Luke relate to each other has become the subje...
Extending an earlier simultaneous comparison of the three Synoptic Gospels to determine the probabil...
In Robert H. Stein’s work, Studying the Synoptic Gospels Origin and Interpretation, he discusses his...
Dr. Scaer explains why the gospels don\u27t say the exact same things.https://scholar.csl.edu/ccntov...
The Synoptic Problem is a puzzle that scholars have desired to solve since the 18th century. The dis...
Thesis (M.A.)--Boston University, 1940There is one main purpose in this study. This purpose is the c...
Reviewed Book: Orchard, Bernard. The Order of the Synoptics: Why Three Synoptic Gospels?. Macon, Ga:...
This thesis compares the relative plausibility of three contemporary Synoptic Gospel source critical...
This paper grows out of research done for reasons quite removed investigating the synoptic problem, ...
This essay argues that the Johannine “colophons” of John 20:30–31 and 21:24–25 support the argument ...