USING APTITUDE MEASUREMENTS FOR THE OPTIMAL ASSIGNMENT OF SUBJECTS TO TREATMENTS WITH AND WITHOUT MASTERY SCORES

For assigning subjects to treatments he point of intersection of within-group regression lines is ordinarily used as the critical point. This decision rule is critized and, for several utility functions and any number of treatments, replaced by optimal monotone, nonrandomized (Bayes) rules. Both treatments with and without mastery scores are considered. Moreover, the effect of unreliable criterion scores on the optimal decision rule is examined, and it is illustrated how qualitative information can be combined with aptitude measurements to improve treatment assignment de-cisions. Although the models in this paper are presented with special reference to the aptitude-treatment interaction problem in education, it is indicated that they apply to a variety of situations in which subjects are assigned to treatments on the basis of some predictor score, as long as there are no allocation quota considerations. Key words: aptitude-treatment interaction, decision theory, criterion-referenced measurement. Many modern instructional programs can be characterized by the fact that they allow students to reach the same learning objectives in different ways. These programs are ofte