1 Can Thomas Kuhn’s Paradigms Help Us Understand Software Engineering?

Recent articles in EJIS have discussed whether or not Information Systems is a ‘discipline’. In The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, Kuhn states that a scientific discipline can be identified by reference to its underlying belief system, the ‘paradigm ’ or ‘disciplinary matrix’, to which all workers in that field must commit. An important element of Kuhn's model is the notion of ‘scientific communities’. We consider here the belief system underlying Software Engineering. We examine the extent to which a belief system analogous to the disciplinary matrix of a Kuhnian science can be identified in Software Engineering. Our preliminary fieldwork has comprised an examination of books used by Software Engineering students and practitioners and in-depth interviews with a number of practitioners. The results of this study suggest that the current status of the theory of Software Engineering parallels Kuhn's ‘pre-paradigm ’ stage of scientific development. At this early stage, theorists and practitioners are divided into schools. These schools are based on differences in the beliefs and models forming their disciplinary matrices. We conclude that the application by analogy of Kuhn’s view of scientific activity to Software Engineering is justifiable. Our findings can assist both Software Engineering theorists and practitioners in improving the understanding of how and why software development projects succeed or fail. Our findings also provide