Reasoning about knowledge is the process of thinking and deciding about whether someone in some circumstance knows some proposition. Recent work in philosophical epistemology has sparked great interest in the em-pirical study of reasoning about knowledge, with most such studies focuse
Abstract: Gettier cases have played a major role in Anglo-American analytic epistemology over the pa...
The paper examines the logic and semantics of knowledge attributions of the form "s knows whether A ...
Abstract: Analytic epistemologists agree that, whatever else is true of epistemic justification, it...
Abstract: In this overview paper, I will attempt to identify and describe some of the common threads...
[ACCESS RESTRICTED TO THE UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI AT REQUEST OF AUTHOR.] What factors influence wheth...
Traditionally, epistemologists have held that only truth-related factors matter in the question of w...
Traditionally, epistemologists have held that only truth-related factors matter in the question of w...
In this chapter, we follow Edward Craig’s (1990) advice: ask what the concept of knowledge does for ...
Under what conditions do we have inferential knowledge? I propose and defend the following principle...
How do people decide which claims should be considered mere beliefs and which count as kno...
Five experiments demonstrate the central role of knowledge attributions in social evaluations. In Ex...
To fully understand processes of knowing and knowledge acquisition, it is necessary to examine peopl...
Epistemologists have become increasingly interested in the practical role of knowledge. One prominen...
A system that reasons about the beliefs of a person must in general be able to ascribe a good deal o...
In this paper I will show that knowledge attributions that involve embedded questions are context de...
Abstract: Gettier cases have played a major role in Anglo-American analytic epistemology over the pa...
The paper examines the logic and semantics of knowledge attributions of the form "s knows whether A ...
Abstract: Analytic epistemologists agree that, whatever else is true of epistemic justification, it...
Abstract: In this overview paper, I will attempt to identify and describe some of the common threads...
[ACCESS RESTRICTED TO THE UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI AT REQUEST OF AUTHOR.] What factors influence wheth...
Traditionally, epistemologists have held that only truth-related factors matter in the question of w...
Traditionally, epistemologists have held that only truth-related factors matter in the question of w...
In this chapter, we follow Edward Craig’s (1990) advice: ask what the concept of knowledge does for ...
Under what conditions do we have inferential knowledge? I propose and defend the following principle...
How do people decide which claims should be considered mere beliefs and which count as kno...
Five experiments demonstrate the central role of knowledge attributions in social evaluations. In Ex...
To fully understand processes of knowing and knowledge acquisition, it is necessary to examine peopl...
Epistemologists have become increasingly interested in the practical role of knowledge. One prominen...
A system that reasons about the beliefs of a person must in general be able to ascribe a good deal o...
In this paper I will show that knowledge attributions that involve embedded questions are context de...
Abstract: Gettier cases have played a major role in Anglo-American analytic epistemology over the pa...
The paper examines the logic and semantics of knowledge attributions of the form "s knows whether A ...
Abstract: Analytic epistemologists agree that, whatever else is true of epistemic justification, it...