We identify two distinct yet complementary epistemological paths to knowledge development. The first one is holistic and field dependent and builds on the concept of plausibility; this path we associate with an entrepreneurial mindset. The second is object-oriented and builds on the concept of probability; this path we associate with the managerial mindset. We believe that both managerial and knowledge management practices have emphasized the second path at the expense of the first. To restore the balance, knowledge management needs to develop processes and tools that will allow it to credibly operate in possible and plausible worlds, so as to extract value from them. We propose a systems framework for thinking through the nature of such to...
In this discussion, we reflect on the value given to knowledge in a business context and deliberate ...
In this discussion, we reflect on the value given to knowledge in a business context and deliberate ...
The field of knowledge management struggles among apparent paradoxical standpoints. Beyond the facts...
It is possible to identify two distinct yet complementary epistemological paths to knowledge develop...
It is possible to identify two distinct yet complementary epistemological paths to knowledge develop...
In this chapter we pursue two goals. First, we aim at giving the reader an overview of the concept o...
Purpose – The purpose of this paper is partly to complete Earl’s framework, but more importantly to ...
This paper provides an evaluation of the literature pertaining to the autopoietic, connectionist, an...
This is an exploratory study aimed at addressing the epistemological basis of Knowledge Management, ...
This is an exploratory study aimed at addressing the epistemological basis of Knowledge Management, ...
In this paper we show that the typical architecture of current KM systems reflects an objectivistic ...
This paper critically contrasts the three main schools of thought on knowledge – namely, those that ...
In this discussion, we reflect on the value given to knowledge in a business context and deliberate ...
Cook and Brown’s (1999) and Spender’s (1997) dynamic epistemological models are used as a framework ...
In this discussion, we reflect on the value given to knowledge in a business context and deliberate ...
In this discussion, we reflect on the value given to knowledge in a business context and deliberate ...
In this discussion, we reflect on the value given to knowledge in a business context and deliberate ...
The field of knowledge management struggles among apparent paradoxical standpoints. Beyond the facts...
It is possible to identify two distinct yet complementary epistemological paths to knowledge develop...
It is possible to identify two distinct yet complementary epistemological paths to knowledge develop...
In this chapter we pursue two goals. First, we aim at giving the reader an overview of the concept o...
Purpose – The purpose of this paper is partly to complete Earl’s framework, but more importantly to ...
This paper provides an evaluation of the literature pertaining to the autopoietic, connectionist, an...
This is an exploratory study aimed at addressing the epistemological basis of Knowledge Management, ...
This is an exploratory study aimed at addressing the epistemological basis of Knowledge Management, ...
In this paper we show that the typical architecture of current KM systems reflects an objectivistic ...
This paper critically contrasts the three main schools of thought on knowledge – namely, those that ...
In this discussion, we reflect on the value given to knowledge in a business context and deliberate ...
Cook and Brown’s (1999) and Spender’s (1997) dynamic epistemological models are used as a framework ...
In this discussion, we reflect on the value given to knowledge in a business context and deliberate ...
In this discussion, we reflect on the value given to knowledge in a business context and deliberate ...
In this discussion, we reflect on the value given to knowledge in a business context and deliberate ...
The field of knowledge management struggles among apparent paradoxical standpoints. Beyond the facts...