Social power, or potential for social influence, has traditionally been conceptualized according to French and Raven’s (1959) power typology. The purpose of this analysis was to examine the relationship between a commonly used scale measuring the original 5-factor model and a more recently developed scale measuring the revised 11-factor model, and evaluate the predictive utility of each. Correlations between corresponding bases on the two scales were weak, suggesting a lack of convergent validity. In addition, the 5-factor scale accounted for a substantially greater proportion of variance than did the 11-factor scale when predicting global power
We performed an independent, direct, and better powered (N = 295) replication of Study 1, an experim...
How does power affect behavior? We posit that this depends on the type of power. We distinguish betw...
The role of differences in power resources between parties for manifest conflict between them is a n...
Social power, or potential for social influence, has traditionally been conceptualized according to ...
This article provides a summary of work done by Raven and his colleagues on bases of power. It range...
Among the most widely used conceptualizations of social power is the five-fold typology developed by...
Although power is fundamental to interpersonal processes, relatively little research has focused on ...
The main purpose of this study is to analyze a measurement instrument developed by Frost & Stahelski...
The perception of group variability is affected by social power and status, Three different mechanis...
Over the past decade several appeals have been made to social psychologists to focus more of their r...
The possession of power can be thought of as having the ability to control the outcome of others (i....
Social power is a fundamental concept in social relationships. Social power is defined as a potentia...
This research examines the impact of the power relationship on tactical action (i.e., damage and con...
University of Minnesota Ph.D. dissertation. September 2011. Major: Family Social Science. Advisors: ...
Human judgments are inherently comparative. At the same time, responses to comparative information a...
We performed an independent, direct, and better powered (N = 295) replication of Study 1, an experim...
How does power affect behavior? We posit that this depends on the type of power. We distinguish betw...
The role of differences in power resources between parties for manifest conflict between them is a n...
Social power, or potential for social influence, has traditionally been conceptualized according to ...
This article provides a summary of work done by Raven and his colleagues on bases of power. It range...
Among the most widely used conceptualizations of social power is the five-fold typology developed by...
Although power is fundamental to interpersonal processes, relatively little research has focused on ...
The main purpose of this study is to analyze a measurement instrument developed by Frost & Stahelski...
The perception of group variability is affected by social power and status, Three different mechanis...
Over the past decade several appeals have been made to social psychologists to focus more of their r...
The possession of power can be thought of as having the ability to control the outcome of others (i....
Social power is a fundamental concept in social relationships. Social power is defined as a potentia...
This research examines the impact of the power relationship on tactical action (i.e., damage and con...
University of Minnesota Ph.D. dissertation. September 2011. Major: Family Social Science. Advisors: ...
Human judgments are inherently comparative. At the same time, responses to comparative information a...
We performed an independent, direct, and better powered (N = 295) replication of Study 1, an experim...
How does power affect behavior? We posit that this depends on the type of power. We distinguish betw...
The role of differences in power resources between parties for manifest conflict between them is a n...