Some years ago, Thomas Kuhn (1962)pointed out that science advances in one oftwo main ways. First, by focusing on the problems and puzzles defined by existing paradigms, and by training students in the some-what rigid methods and models of our disci-plines, science inevitably makes progress by filling in gaps in knowledge and refuting existing hypotheses. Kuhn referred to this as “normal science, ” and it constitutes the major mechanism by which scientists produce knowledge that sup-ports contemporary models of the phenomena of interest. Second, in addition to this mode of activity, science progresses by developing fresh approaches, by shifting the paradigms, or by repudiating the past through more dramatic sci-entific revolutions. Kuhn’s w...
A particular scientific world view has become dominant, influential and successful in modern science...
the use of the term ‘paradigm’. He later tried to answer the criticism in several works, by discussi...
Few recent works have generated as much intellectual discussion as Thomas S. Kuhn\u27s The Structure...
Thomas S. Kuhn's structural account on the production of scientific knowledge constructs a generaliz...
In 1962, the publication of Thomas Kuhn’s Structure ‘revolutionized’ the way one conducts philosophi...
Thomas Kuhn, in The Structure of Scientific Revolution, distinguishes between two types of sciences-...
discussed the resistance of science to embrace new concepts. He described how fields of scientific r...
Having in my earlier paper (Chinwah, 2001) traced the early beginnings of philosophy, science and sc...
Thomas Kuhn's thinking in this case is used as an analytical knife to see the revolution in science ...
Abstract Thomas Kuhn divides scientific movement into normal science and revolutionary science. Ther...
Thomas Kuhn divides scientific movement into nonnal science and revolutionary science. There is a di...
As part of humanity's inexorable quest for knowledge, modern science has significantly enhanced peop...
Thomas S. Kuhn's "The Structure of Scientific Revolutions" describes the cyclical process by which s...
Kuhn argues that a paradigm generally emerges from among such competing schools as the result of a p...
Up to the 1960s the prevalent view of science was that it was a step-by-step undertaking in slow, pi...
A particular scientific world view has become dominant, influential and successful in modern science...
the use of the term ‘paradigm’. He later tried to answer the criticism in several works, by discussi...
Few recent works have generated as much intellectual discussion as Thomas S. Kuhn\u27s The Structure...
Thomas S. Kuhn's structural account on the production of scientific knowledge constructs a generaliz...
In 1962, the publication of Thomas Kuhn’s Structure ‘revolutionized’ the way one conducts philosophi...
Thomas Kuhn, in The Structure of Scientific Revolution, distinguishes between two types of sciences-...
discussed the resistance of science to embrace new concepts. He described how fields of scientific r...
Having in my earlier paper (Chinwah, 2001) traced the early beginnings of philosophy, science and sc...
Thomas Kuhn's thinking in this case is used as an analytical knife to see the revolution in science ...
Abstract Thomas Kuhn divides scientific movement into normal science and revolutionary science. Ther...
Thomas Kuhn divides scientific movement into nonnal science and revolutionary science. There is a di...
As part of humanity's inexorable quest for knowledge, modern science has significantly enhanced peop...
Thomas S. Kuhn's "The Structure of Scientific Revolutions" describes the cyclical process by which s...
Kuhn argues that a paradigm generally emerges from among such competing schools as the result of a p...
Up to the 1960s the prevalent view of science was that it was a step-by-step undertaking in slow, pi...
A particular scientific world view has become dominant, influential and successful in modern science...
the use of the term ‘paradigm’. He later tried to answer the criticism in several works, by discussi...
Few recent works have generated as much intellectual discussion as Thomas S. Kuhn\u27s The Structure...