This paper questions results that claim to extend non-cooperative models of bargaining in legislatures from the highly atypical three-party case to a generic n-party setting. It identifies problems both with the derivation of theoretical results and the empirical evaluation of these. No empirically robust formateur advantage can be observed in field data on bargaining over government formation. The paper concludes with a modeling agenda of uncontroversial empirical statements about the government formation process and argues that these should form the premises of a more compelling new model of this crucial political process
Political parties bargain over the allocation of cabinet portfolios when forming coalition governmen...
When voting takes place in democratic institutions, we find (either explicitly or implicitly) that t...
Abstract. Many multiagent settings require a collection of agents to partition themselves into coali...
Coalition bargaining is at the heart of politics in most parliamentary democracies. Given the preval...
peer reviewedA standard conclusion of theorists who model bargaining as a non-cooperative game is th...
In this paper we estimate a bargaining model of government formation in parliamentary democracies. W...
International audienceIn this paper, we apply bargaining theory to a certain model of coalition form...
We propose a new model of legislative bargaining in which coalitions may have different values, refl...
Over the last two decades a large and important literature has emerged that uses game theoretic mode...
Models of government formation processes in multi-party democracies are unusually highly sensitive t...
We study a game theoretic model of a parliamentary democracy under proportional representation where...
Why do some government formation periods end after a few days, while others last for several weeks o...
The paper analyses the process of coalition formation among political parties using game-theoretic c...
A self-enforcing, equilibrium account of legislative party organization in the context of the standa...
In this paper we propose a formal model of bargaining for govern-ment formation in a parliamentary d...
Political parties bargain over the allocation of cabinet portfolios when forming coalition governmen...
When voting takes place in democratic institutions, we find (either explicitly or implicitly) that t...
Abstract. Many multiagent settings require a collection of agents to partition themselves into coali...
Coalition bargaining is at the heart of politics in most parliamentary democracies. Given the preval...
peer reviewedA standard conclusion of theorists who model bargaining as a non-cooperative game is th...
In this paper we estimate a bargaining model of government formation in parliamentary democracies. W...
International audienceIn this paper, we apply bargaining theory to a certain model of coalition form...
We propose a new model of legislative bargaining in which coalitions may have different values, refl...
Over the last two decades a large and important literature has emerged that uses game theoretic mode...
Models of government formation processes in multi-party democracies are unusually highly sensitive t...
We study a game theoretic model of a parliamentary democracy under proportional representation where...
Why do some government formation periods end after a few days, while others last for several weeks o...
The paper analyses the process of coalition formation among political parties using game-theoretic c...
A self-enforcing, equilibrium account of legislative party organization in the context of the standa...
In this paper we propose a formal model of bargaining for govern-ment formation in a parliamentary d...
Political parties bargain over the allocation of cabinet portfolios when forming coalition governmen...
When voting takes place in democratic institutions, we find (either explicitly or implicitly) that t...
Abstract. Many multiagent settings require a collection of agents to partition themselves into coali...