Mapping characters on a tree with or without the outgroups

A character of special interest in evolutionary studies is usually optimized on a phylogenetic tree, with or without the outgroups employed in that analysis. Both practices are never justified and look like arbitrary choices. Focusing on one example, we draw the conclusion that authors retain or remove outgroups depending on the way these outgroups sample the diversity of states of the character(s) of special interest. The topology without outgroups is often used by authors when different outgroup taxa non-exhaustively sample the different states of the character of interest outside of the ingroup. This can make the analysis incoherent, because its different steps are not based on the same data matrix (outgroups are removed in the last step). It can provide several incoherent and possibly different patterns for a same character of interest, one issuing from the first step of phylogeny construction and the other resulting from the a posteriori optimization on the truncated topology. Phylogenetic analyses should be designed to minimize this problem, selecting outgroup and ingroup taxa whose diversity of character states is needed for reconstructing the evolutionary history of the character of interest. The Willi Hennig Society 2004. Over the last two decades, phylogenetic trees have increasingly been used to infer the evolutionary histories of characters of special interest (Coddington, 1988, 1994