We consider the recent novel two-step estimator of Iaryczower and Shum (2012), who analyze voting decisions of US Supreme Court justices. Motivated by the un-derlying theoretical voting model, we suggest estimates of the structural parame-ters based on their methodology should generally benefit from including interaction terms between individual and time covariates in the first stage whenever there is individual heterogeneity in expertise. We show numerically, via simulation and re-estimation of the US Supreme Court data, that the first order interaction effects that appear in the theoretical model can have an important empirical implication
Abstract: In this paper we estimate spatial voting models for the analysis of the voting record of t...
We propose an empirically relevant measure of voting power that uses the information about real or a...
Ideal point estimators are typically based on an assumption that all legislators are equally respons...
We consider the recent novel two‐step estimator of Iaryczower and Shum (American Economic Review 20...
The files included in this project are therefore the US Supreme court data that is obtained from Iar...
We consider the recent novel two-step estimator of Iaryczower and Shum (American Economic Review 201...
In many areas of economics there is a growing interest in how expertise and preferences drive indivi...
Ideal point estimation in political science usually aims to reduce a matrix of votes to a small numb...
We build simple models for the distribution of voting patterns in a group, using the Supreme Court ...
We explain how to use elicited priors in Bayesian political science research. These are a form of pr...
We explain how to use elicited priors in Bayesian political science research. These are a form of pr...
Fundamental to many accounts of decision-making within political institutions is the interdependence...
Despite the fact that judicial scholars have developed reasonably well-specified models of the votin...
We develop a Bayesian multivariate analysis of expert judgment elicited using an extended form of pa...
Jurisprudential regime theory is a legal explanation of decision-making on the U.S. Supreme Court th...
Abstract: In this paper we estimate spatial voting models for the analysis of the voting record of t...
We propose an empirically relevant measure of voting power that uses the information about real or a...
Ideal point estimators are typically based on an assumption that all legislators are equally respons...
We consider the recent novel two‐step estimator of Iaryczower and Shum (American Economic Review 20...
The files included in this project are therefore the US Supreme court data that is obtained from Iar...
We consider the recent novel two-step estimator of Iaryczower and Shum (American Economic Review 201...
In many areas of economics there is a growing interest in how expertise and preferences drive indivi...
Ideal point estimation in political science usually aims to reduce a matrix of votes to a small numb...
We build simple models for the distribution of voting patterns in a group, using the Supreme Court ...
We explain how to use elicited priors in Bayesian political science research. These are a form of pr...
We explain how to use elicited priors in Bayesian political science research. These are a form of pr...
Fundamental to many accounts of decision-making within political institutions is the interdependence...
Despite the fact that judicial scholars have developed reasonably well-specified models of the votin...
We develop a Bayesian multivariate analysis of expert judgment elicited using an extended form of pa...
Jurisprudential regime theory is a legal explanation of decision-making on the U.S. Supreme Court th...
Abstract: In this paper we estimate spatial voting models for the analysis of the voting record of t...
We propose an empirically relevant measure of voting power that uses the information about real or a...
Ideal point estimators are typically based on an assumption that all legislators are equally respons...