Abstract. We present a exible framework for cooperating decision pro-cedures. We describe the properties needed to ensure correctness and show how it can be applied to implement an ecient version of Nel-son and Oppen's algorithm for combining decision procedures. We also show how a Shostak style decision procedure can be implemented in the framework in such a way that it can be integrated with the Nelson-Oppen method.
International audiencePurpose The purpose of this paper is to discuss the advantage of a combinator...
Abstract: Collaborative engineering requires collaborative group decisions. This paper presents foun...
We look at any cooperative design process as a decision making process, i.e. a non deterministic pro...
We give a detailed survey of the current state-of-the-art methods for combining decision procedures....
AbstractImplementing efficient algorithms for combining decision procedures has been a challenge and...
Decision-making has evolved recently thanks to the introduction of information and communication tec...
A review of the multicriterion literature reveals the large number of multiple criteria aggregation ...
In multiperson decision analysis there are two basic types of decision situation. One is the case of...
Decision procedures are increasingly being employed for deciding or simplifying propositional combin...
The benefice of a collective decisions process mainly rests upon the possibility for the participant...
The paper proposes a unification of the two main frameworks commonly used for the analysis of collec...
Abstract. Decision procedures are increasingly being employed for de-ciding or simplifying propositi...
Many decisions in organizations are made, or at least prepared, by multiple cooperating decision mak...
Abstract:- Decision making consists in choosing, on the basis of various criteria, an appropriate su...
The SharedPlans formalization of collaboration (Grosz and Kraus 1999) stipulates that collaborating ...
International audiencePurpose The purpose of this paper is to discuss the advantage of a combinator...
Abstract: Collaborative engineering requires collaborative group decisions. This paper presents foun...
We look at any cooperative design process as a decision making process, i.e. a non deterministic pro...
We give a detailed survey of the current state-of-the-art methods for combining decision procedures....
AbstractImplementing efficient algorithms for combining decision procedures has been a challenge and...
Decision-making has evolved recently thanks to the introduction of information and communication tec...
A review of the multicriterion literature reveals the large number of multiple criteria aggregation ...
In multiperson decision analysis there are two basic types of decision situation. One is the case of...
Decision procedures are increasingly being employed for deciding or simplifying propositional combin...
The benefice of a collective decisions process mainly rests upon the possibility for the participant...
The paper proposes a unification of the two main frameworks commonly used for the analysis of collec...
Abstract. Decision procedures are increasingly being employed for de-ciding or simplifying propositi...
Many decisions in organizations are made, or at least prepared, by multiple cooperating decision mak...
Abstract:- Decision making consists in choosing, on the basis of various criteria, an appropriate su...
The SharedPlans formalization of collaboration (Grosz and Kraus 1999) stipulates that collaborating ...
International audiencePurpose The purpose of this paper is to discuss the advantage of a combinator...
Abstract: Collaborative engineering requires collaborative group decisions. This paper presents foun...
We look at any cooperative design process as a decision making process, i.e. a non deterministic pro...