Existing models of cross-subsidization have focused on either ex ante distortions to investments or misallocations of common costs as the principal sources of cross-subsidies in regulated firms. In this paper, we identify a third vehicle for such cross-subsidization that, given regulators ’ preferences, is not only likely but likely to be prominent; namely, the misestimation of the magnitude of common costs. Because our results incorporate regulators ’ preferences, they may provide the nec-essary building block for a positive theory of the magnitude of observed common costs that has, heretofore, been absent in the literature. (JEL L51, L97) I
We study the problem faced by a central planner trying to increase the consumption of a good, such a...
This Article addresses an important question in modern antitrust: when large investment funds have h...
This note studies the cost−reducing incentives in a mixed duopoly market. The result shows that whil...
The definition and measurement of cross subsidy, which has emerged as an issue in utility regulation...
Cross-subsidization arises naturally when firms with different comparative ad- vantages compete for ...
Cross-subsidization arises naturally when firms with different comparative ad- vantages compete for ...
Although elusive of measurement, cross subsidies are widely believed to have existed on a significan...
We propose two cost-sharing theories in which agents demand comparable commodities and are responsib...
Although there exists an extensive and growing literature on how firms should and should not allocat...
We propose two axiomatic theories of cost sharing with the common premise that agents demand compara...
The present study analyses the effects on social welfare of the existence of cross-participation at ...
This paper examines price-setting duopoly games with production subsidies and shows that the optimal...
Common ownership - where two rms are at least partially owned by the same investor - and its impact...
International audienceIn a supranational common market, national regulation can produce inefficienci...
We experimentally compare the “winner’s-bid auction” and “divide-and-choose” mech-anisms when two pa...
We study the problem faced by a central planner trying to increase the consumption of a good, such a...
This Article addresses an important question in modern antitrust: when large investment funds have h...
This note studies the cost−reducing incentives in a mixed duopoly market. The result shows that whil...
The definition and measurement of cross subsidy, which has emerged as an issue in utility regulation...
Cross-subsidization arises naturally when firms with different comparative ad- vantages compete for ...
Cross-subsidization arises naturally when firms with different comparative ad- vantages compete for ...
Although elusive of measurement, cross subsidies are widely believed to have existed on a significan...
We propose two cost-sharing theories in which agents demand comparable commodities and are responsib...
Although there exists an extensive and growing literature on how firms should and should not allocat...
We propose two axiomatic theories of cost sharing with the common premise that agents demand compara...
The present study analyses the effects on social welfare of the existence of cross-participation at ...
This paper examines price-setting duopoly games with production subsidies and shows that the optimal...
Common ownership - where two rms are at least partially owned by the same investor - and its impact...
International audienceIn a supranational common market, national regulation can produce inefficienci...
We experimentally compare the “winner’s-bid auction” and “divide-and-choose” mech-anisms when two pa...
We study the problem faced by a central planner trying to increase the consumption of a good, such a...
This Article addresses an important question in modern antitrust: when large investment funds have h...
This note studies the cost−reducing incentives in a mixed duopoly market. The result shows that whil...