An evaluation of the Washington State Environmental Policy Act's (SEPA) use by King County shows that the substantive provisions of SEPA are seldom used. Because of this lack of use, the fundamental purposes of the act are being undermined and ecological damage continues without accountability. We propose a simple approach to increase the use of the substantive provision. The approach requires that administrators make precise interpretations of often vague environ-mental policies. This will result in increased use of applied science in the adaptive management paradigm and fulfilling the substantive intent of SEPA
The National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) was passed by Congress in 1969 declaring a policy whic...
textMany planners and researchers pay attention to the potentials of Environmental Impact Assessmen...
Supplemental Environmental Projects (SUPs) are environmentally benefical projects included in settle...
As the Washington State Environmental Policy Act of 1971 (SEPA)\u27approaches its fourteenth birthda...
This comment analyzes the problems created by the Forest Practices Act’s scheme for environmental re...
The State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) requires that any action that may have a significant adver...
This Comment seeks to answer the question raised by West Main II and Cougar Mountain of what procedu...
The intent of this article is to provide an overview of SEPA for the general practitioner. It will d...
The EIS requirement is the most precise of SEPA\u27s procedural commands. The EIS itself must be a f...
Municipalities in the United States are increasingly active in the effort to reduce greenhouse gas e...
The National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) requires all federal agencies to consider the environme...
Washington enacted the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) in 1971, which required that considerat...
Environmental impact assessment (EIA) is a process to determine the significant environmental and so...
Problems of population settlement, urbanization, in-dustrial development, technology advancement, an...
In 1971, Washington enacted the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA), which requires agencies to ma...
The National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) was passed by Congress in 1969 declaring a policy whic...
textMany planners and researchers pay attention to the potentials of Environmental Impact Assessmen...
Supplemental Environmental Projects (SUPs) are environmentally benefical projects included in settle...
As the Washington State Environmental Policy Act of 1971 (SEPA)\u27approaches its fourteenth birthda...
This comment analyzes the problems created by the Forest Practices Act’s scheme for environmental re...
The State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) requires that any action that may have a significant adver...
This Comment seeks to answer the question raised by West Main II and Cougar Mountain of what procedu...
The intent of this article is to provide an overview of SEPA for the general practitioner. It will d...
The EIS requirement is the most precise of SEPA\u27s procedural commands. The EIS itself must be a f...
Municipalities in the United States are increasingly active in the effort to reduce greenhouse gas e...
The National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) requires all federal agencies to consider the environme...
Washington enacted the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) in 1971, which required that considerat...
Environmental impact assessment (EIA) is a process to determine the significant environmental and so...
Problems of population settlement, urbanization, in-dustrial development, technology advancement, an...
In 1971, Washington enacted the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA), which requires agencies to ma...
The National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) was passed by Congress in 1969 declaring a policy whic...
textMany planners and researchers pay attention to the potentials of Environmental Impact Assessmen...
Supplemental Environmental Projects (SUPs) are environmentally benefical projects included in settle...