Undocumented Migrants and Resistance in the State of Exception

This paper examines the relationship between the state and the undocumented migrant by building on Giorgio’s Agamben concepts of “bare life ” and “state of exception. ” In particular, the paper explores the possibility of resistance by migrants in the state of exception, and the implications of noncompliance for the exercise of state sovereignty. Agamben’s notion of “state of exception ” describes the augmentation of government powers during times of emergency when state sovereignty is perceived to be under threat. In states of emergency, governments suspend elements of the normal legal order and strip individuals of rights, even their legal identity. Whereas Agamben treats the state’s denial of a legal identity to migrants as the sine qua non of state power, this paper will examine what might be called the “reverse state of exception”: instances where migrants strip themselves of their legal identity in order to evade state control. Whereas Agamben treats legal status as the basis for individual rights, this paper will consider the circumstance where the possession of a legal identity constitutes a liability to the illegal migrant. The paper argues that in instances where migrants have lost all claims against the state and are confronted with expulsion, many will resort to an extreme act of resistance against the state: the destruction of their identity documents. By rendering themselves unclassifiable, illegal migrants oftentimes succeed in tying the hands of the sovereign who is forced to operate within the constraint