1 The Integration for All By Metin USTA The Student of Political Science

In the era of globalization, there are several problems for societies. The distribution of wealth, lack of communication between different communities, human rights issue is some of them. In that sense, the lack of integration within the domestic societies and between cultures cytolyses these problems. As an egalitarian liberal, Michael Walzer suggests the distributive justice as a correct line. In order understand what does the distributive justice mean, we should firstly look at the egalitarian liberalism. Typical liberal egalitarian conceptualizations of civil society result in versions of the sphere concept. Civil society is thought to pick out dense networks of social exchange outside the political sphere. Ideally, civil society is a realm in which citizens pursue their comprehensive ends and develop the principles, practices, and virtues conducive to democratic government. Sensing the tension present in these two aims, some liberal egalitarians argue that civil society requires the influence and regulation of a strong central government in order to keep the political culture.1 Recognizing the pluralistic nature of society and personal relationships, Walzer proceeds to describe a system of distributive justice that he characterizes as "egalitarianism that is consistent with liberty. " In that sense, there are six propositions his theory of "social goods, " which consists of distributive justice. 1. The meaning and value of all goods (money, power, love, and so forth) are socially created and vary from one society to the next. Social goods do not include privately valued goods, such as sunsets or mountain air