Scientific Contribution A Critique of Liberal Eugenics: Disability and the Problem of Inclusion

Abstract: This paper examines the arguments held by the proponents of “liberal eugenics. ” Specific emphasis is placed upon current discussions of disability within these arguments. First, the basis of the proponents of liberal eugenics is examined. The arguments held by the proponents are based on separating existing people with disability and the object of intervention or selection (fetus or embryo). The separation is summarized in the thesis that “devalues disabilities, not people with disabilities.” We show that this thesis is not consistent. Secondly, this paper examines the meanings of “inclusion. ” Proponents of liberal eugenics claim that genetic intervention is not an exclusive way for people with disabilities. However, we show that the basis of the proponents of preventing the birth of people with disabilities is the ongoing social system with its interests; the ongoing social system is itself exclusive of people with disabilities. In conclusion, we insist that the genetic intervention technologies used to prevent the birth of people with disability represent exclusive technology and technology clearly based on eliminative attitudes