Abstract. A heuristic search procedure for inventing legal arguments is built on two tools already widely in use in argumentation. Argumentation schemes are forms of argument representing premise-conclusion and inference structures of common types of arguments. Schemes especially useful in law represent defeasible argu-ments, like argument from expert opinion. Argument diagramming is a visualiza-tion tool used to display a chain of connected arguments linked together. One such tool, Araucaria, available free a
AbstractThe present paper discusses experimental argument assistance tools. In contrast with automat...
The first goal of this paper is to review some of the steps necessary in developing a system that re...
Argumentation theory involves the analysis of naturally occurring argument, and one key tool employe...
This paper argues that the best chance of utilising AI & Law models of legal argument in practice in...
We will review systems that can store conflicting interpretations and that can propose alternative s...
Today's argumentation software mostly emphasizes the logical structure of reasoning, and especially ...
As shown by several of the papers in this special issue, current technology being developed for argu...
Today's argumentation software mostly emphasizes the logical structure of reasoning, and especially ...
In this paper, we present a survey of the development of the technique of argument diagramming cover...
In this paper, we present a survey of the development of the technique of argument diagramming cover...
This paper reviews the history of AI & Law research from the perspective of argument schemes. It sta...
This paper presents a model of an algorithmic framework and a system for the discovery of non sequit...
A popular view of what Artificial Intelligence can do for lawyers is that it can do no more than ded...
In this paper, we present a survey of the development of the technique of argument diagramming cover...
The present paper discusses experimental argument assistance tools. In contrast with automated reaso...
AbstractThe present paper discusses experimental argument assistance tools. In contrast with automat...
The first goal of this paper is to review some of the steps necessary in developing a system that re...
Argumentation theory involves the analysis of naturally occurring argument, and one key tool employe...
This paper argues that the best chance of utilising AI & Law models of legal argument in practice in...
We will review systems that can store conflicting interpretations and that can propose alternative s...
Today's argumentation software mostly emphasizes the logical structure of reasoning, and especially ...
As shown by several of the papers in this special issue, current technology being developed for argu...
Today's argumentation software mostly emphasizes the logical structure of reasoning, and especially ...
In this paper, we present a survey of the development of the technique of argument diagramming cover...
In this paper, we present a survey of the development of the technique of argument diagramming cover...
This paper reviews the history of AI & Law research from the perspective of argument schemes. It sta...
This paper presents a model of an algorithmic framework and a system for the discovery of non sequit...
A popular view of what Artificial Intelligence can do for lawyers is that it can do no more than ded...
In this paper, we present a survey of the development of the technique of argument diagramming cover...
The present paper discusses experimental argument assistance tools. In contrast with automated reaso...
AbstractThe present paper discusses experimental argument assistance tools. In contrast with automat...
The first goal of this paper is to review some of the steps necessary in developing a system that re...
Argumentation theory involves the analysis of naturally occurring argument, and one key tool employe...