We propose new scoring rules based on partial likelihood for assessing the relative out-of-sample predictive accuracy of competing density forecasts over a specific re-gion of interest, such as the left tail in financial risk management. By construction, existing scoring rules based on weighted likelihood or censored normal likelihood favor density forecasts with more probability mass in the given region, rendering predictive accuracy tests biased towards such densities. Our novel partial likelihood-based scoring rules do not suffer from this problem, as illustrated by means of Monte Carlo simulations and an empirical application to daily S&P 500 index returns
This paper proposes a novel asymmetric continuous probabilistic score (ACPS) for evaluating and comp...
This article proposes a novel asymmetric continuous probabilistic score (ACPS) for evaluating and co...
Ascoring rule S(x; q) provides away of judging the quality of a quoted probability density q for a r...
We propose new scoring rules based on partial likelihood for assessing the relative out-of-sample pr...
We propose new scoring rules based on partial likelihood for assessing the relative out-of-sample pr...
We propose and evaluate several new scoring rules based on (partial) likelihood ra-tios for comparin...
We propose and evaluate several new scoring rules based on likelihood ratios, for comparing forecast...
Improving Value-at-Risk estimates by combining density forecasts 1 This research focuses on the prop...
We investigate the added value of combining density forecasts focused on a specific region of suppor...
In this paper we propose a testing procedure for comparing the predictive abilities of possibly miss...
markdownabstract__Abstract__ We investigate the added value of combining density forecasts for as...
This paper proposes and analyzes tests that can be used to compare the accuracy of alternative condi...
In this research we introduce an analyzing procedure using the Kullback-Leibler information criteria...
In this research we introduce an analyzing procedure using the Kullback-Leibler information criteria...
This paper proposes a novel asymmetric continuous probabilistic score (ACPS) for evaluating and comp...
This paper proposes a novel asymmetric continuous probabilistic score (ACPS) for evaluating and comp...
This article proposes a novel asymmetric continuous probabilistic score (ACPS) for evaluating and co...
Ascoring rule S(x; q) provides away of judging the quality of a quoted probability density q for a r...
We propose new scoring rules based on partial likelihood for assessing the relative out-of-sample pr...
We propose new scoring rules based on partial likelihood for assessing the relative out-of-sample pr...
We propose and evaluate several new scoring rules based on (partial) likelihood ra-tios for comparin...
We propose and evaluate several new scoring rules based on likelihood ratios, for comparing forecast...
Improving Value-at-Risk estimates by combining density forecasts 1 This research focuses on the prop...
We investigate the added value of combining density forecasts focused on a specific region of suppor...
In this paper we propose a testing procedure for comparing the predictive abilities of possibly miss...
markdownabstract__Abstract__ We investigate the added value of combining density forecasts for as...
This paper proposes and analyzes tests that can be used to compare the accuracy of alternative condi...
In this research we introduce an analyzing procedure using the Kullback-Leibler information criteria...
In this research we introduce an analyzing procedure using the Kullback-Leibler information criteria...
This paper proposes a novel asymmetric continuous probabilistic score (ACPS) for evaluating and comp...
This paper proposes a novel asymmetric continuous probabilistic score (ACPS) for evaluating and comp...
This article proposes a novel asymmetric continuous probabilistic score (ACPS) for evaluating and co...
Ascoring rule S(x; q) provides away of judging the quality of a quoted probability density q for a r...