We apply data mining to version histories in order to guide programmers along related changes: “Programmers who changed these functions also changed... ”. Given a set of existing changes, such rules (a) suggest and predict likely further changes, (b) show up item coupling that is in-detectable by program analysis, and (c) prevent errors due to incomplete changes. After an initial change, our ROSE prototype can correctly predict 26 % of further files to be changed—and 15 % of the precise functions or variables. The topmost three suggestions contain a correct location with a likelihood of 64%. 1
Identifying repetitive code changes benefits developers, tool builders, and researchers. Tool builde...
As software evolves, analysis and design models should be modified, correspondingly. In this scenari...
It is a widely accepted fact that evolving software systems change and grow. However, it is less wel...
Software developers are often faced with modification tasks that involve source which is spread acro...
Ability to predict whether a change in one file may require a change in another can be extremely hel...
As a software system evolves, developers make changes to add new features ot fix different kinds of ...
Today, programmers are forced to maintain a software system based on their gut feeling and experienc...
It is well known that maintenance is the most expensive stage of the software life cycle. Most large...
While most of the existing class stability assessors just rely on structural information retrieved f...
Abstract—Detecting bugs as early as possible plays an impor-tant role in ensuring software quality b...
Traditional algorithms for detecting differences in source code focus on differences between lines. ...
Modern distributed version control systems, such as Git, offer support for branching — the possibili...
This paper introduces a new technique for finding latent software bugs called change classification....
Software developers repeatedly perform similar but non-identical changes to a systems source code. S...
As a software system evolves, programmers make changes which sometimes lead to problems. The risk of...
Identifying repetitive code changes benefits developers, tool builders, and researchers. Tool builde...
As software evolves, analysis and design models should be modified, correspondingly. In this scenari...
It is a widely accepted fact that evolving software systems change and grow. However, it is less wel...
Software developers are often faced with modification tasks that involve source which is spread acro...
Ability to predict whether a change in one file may require a change in another can be extremely hel...
As a software system evolves, developers make changes to add new features ot fix different kinds of ...
Today, programmers are forced to maintain a software system based on their gut feeling and experienc...
It is well known that maintenance is the most expensive stage of the software life cycle. Most large...
While most of the existing class stability assessors just rely on structural information retrieved f...
Abstract—Detecting bugs as early as possible plays an impor-tant role in ensuring software quality b...
Traditional algorithms for detecting differences in source code focus on differences between lines. ...
Modern distributed version control systems, such as Git, offer support for branching — the possibili...
This paper introduces a new technique for finding latent software bugs called change classification....
Software developers repeatedly perform similar but non-identical changes to a systems source code. S...
As a software system evolves, programmers make changes which sometimes lead to problems. The risk of...
Identifying repetitive code changes benefits developers, tool builders, and researchers. Tool builde...
As software evolves, analysis and design models should be modified, correspondingly. In this scenari...
It is a widely accepted fact that evolving software systems change and grow. However, it is less wel...