Measures of unemployment and poverty have tended to focus solely on those currently unemployed or below the poverty line, ignoring people who are vulnerable to becoming unemployed or falling into poverty. Current literature and policy discussion in this area tend to assume that since vulnerability causes pain, taking account of vulnerability will make effective unemployment and poverty higher. This paper argues that, at the aggregate level, vulnerability should be viewed as 'good ' because, with unemployment constant, the presence of vulnerable people mean that there must also exist currently unemployed people who expect to find work in the near future. Hence, a higher vulnerability simply means that the burden of unemployment is ...