The Relationship between Essentialist Beliefs and Evolutionary Reasoning

Historians of science have pointed to essentialist beliefs about species as a major impediment to the discovery of natural selection. The present study investigated whether such beliefs are an impediment to learning this concept as well. Participants (43 children aged four to nine and 34 adults) were asked to judge the variability of various behavioral and anatomical properties across different members of the same species. Adults who accepted within-species variation – both actual and potential – were significantly more likely to demonstrate a selection-based understanding of evolution than adults who denied within-species variation. The latter demonstrated an alternative, incorrect understanding of evolution and produced response patterns that were both quantitatively and qualitatively similar to those produced by preschool-aged children. Overall, it is argued that psychological essentialism, though a useful bias for drawing species-wide inductions, leads individuals to devalue within-species variation and, consequently, to fail to understand natural selection