Does one’s own name attract attention? To answer this question, the present study conducted four experiments. Experiment 1 replicat-ed Bundesen, Kyllingsbaek, Houmann, and Jensen (1997) and found no evidence for attentional attraction by observer’s own name. Experiments 2 and 3 showed that Bundesen et al.’s two arguments did not explain the null effect. Experiment 4 directed the ob-server’s set to identify names and revealed attentional attraction by observer’s own name. These four experiments, using Japanese names, revealed that attentional attraction to the observer’s name depends on the observer’s set. Key words: attentional attraction, observer’s set, visual cocktail party effect
Name agreement is the extent to which different people agree on a name for a particular picture. Pre...
In four experiments, participants named target pictures that were accompanied by distractor pictures...
We examined how similarity influences the ability to associate names and faces. In Experiment 1, mul...
This study examined the attention capturing effect by one’s own name using a cross-modal oddball tas...
The "visual cocktail party effect" refers to superior report of a participant's own name, under cond...
Participants completed a dot probe task that presented pairs of first names: the participant’s own n...
AbstractModels of the attentional blink phenomenon (AB) typically assume that unattended information...
The prior production of an alternative name increases the time taken to name a famous face. For exam...
The results of two experiments by Horton (2007) show that speakers name a pictured object faster whe...
The results of two experiments by Horton (2007) show that speakers name a pictured object faster whe...
Numerous studies show that names are non-arbitrarily assigned to objects. For instance, a well-resea...
Object detection and identification are fundamental visual tasks and recent work suggests that it i...
die y in on, 17 present study, a stimulus that is unique to each individual was used: the self-face....
Name agreement is the extent to which different people agree on a name for a particular picture. Pre...
Here, we demonstrated that one\u27s own name attracts the subjective location of a visual target. We...
Name agreement is the extent to which different people agree on a name for a particular picture. Pre...
In four experiments, participants named target pictures that were accompanied by distractor pictures...
We examined how similarity influences the ability to associate names and faces. In Experiment 1, mul...
This study examined the attention capturing effect by one’s own name using a cross-modal oddball tas...
The "visual cocktail party effect" refers to superior report of a participant's own name, under cond...
Participants completed a dot probe task that presented pairs of first names: the participant’s own n...
AbstractModels of the attentional blink phenomenon (AB) typically assume that unattended information...
The prior production of an alternative name increases the time taken to name a famous face. For exam...
The results of two experiments by Horton (2007) show that speakers name a pictured object faster whe...
The results of two experiments by Horton (2007) show that speakers name a pictured object faster whe...
Numerous studies show that names are non-arbitrarily assigned to objects. For instance, a well-resea...
Object detection and identification are fundamental visual tasks and recent work suggests that it i...
die y in on, 17 present study, a stimulus that is unique to each individual was used: the self-face....
Name agreement is the extent to which different people agree on a name for a particular picture. Pre...
Here, we demonstrated that one\u27s own name attracts the subjective location of a visual target. We...
Name agreement is the extent to which different people agree on a name for a particular picture. Pre...
In four experiments, participants named target pictures that were accompanied by distractor pictures...
We examined how similarity influences the ability to associate names and faces. In Experiment 1, mul...