Center for Therapeutic Assessment

Psychologists in health care settings today find it increasingly difficult to obtain authorization and appropriate reimbursement for psychological ssessments from 3rd party payers. Authorization and reimbursement denials often are based on allegations that empirical support for the utility and validity of psychological tests is nonexistent or limited. This article reviews a sample of the considerable empirical support that exists for the utility and validity of a variety of psychological tests for a wide range of clinical health care applications. Informed by data such as these, psychologists should become more effective in their abilities to seek authorization and reimbursement for assessment and overturning denials. Obtaining authorization and reimbursement for psychological assessments from third party payers has become increasingly dif-ficult for psychologists (Eisman et al., 2000; Piotrowski, Belter, & Keller, 1998). Difficulty obtaining preanthorization, limitations in instrument selection and time, and reduced or nonexistent remu-neration for psychological assessments have become the norm. As a result, psychologists now use psychological assessment less frequently than in the past (Eisman et al., 2000; Piotrowski et al.