Weighing the evidence for cross over in neglect

When patients with left-sided neglect are asked to bisect horizontal lines, they tend to place their marks to the right of the line’s objective mid-point. However, when asked to bisect short lines they are either more accurate or paradoxically cross over and place their marks to the left of the objective mid-point. Previous explanations of the cross over phenomenon have considered specific aberrations of spatial attention. However, these explanations make no predictions about judgments of non-spatial stimuli. Two patients with right brain damage were asked to judge weights placed on both hands simultaneously. They were biased in reporting weights on the right as being heavier than those on the left. This rightward bias changed with lighter pairs of weights presented in the context of equal reference weights. In one patient the directional bias was eliminated and in the other the bias was reversed so that she was more likely to report the left weight as heavier than the right. These data suggest that a phenomenon analogous to cross over in line bisections also occurs with judgments of non-spatial stimuli. Representations of stimuli appear to be influenced by features of the stimuli encountered on-line and by memory traces of similar stimuli encountered previously. With an attentional deficit, memory traces influence the magnitude of the representation derived on-lin