We show that, under plausible hypotheses, an enforcement agency without commitment power will not undertake any enforcement effort at all in a static game. Indeed, punishment of noncompliant agents does not necessarily bring social benefits in itself. In a dynamic framework, however, the enforcement agency might inspect private agents in order to develop a reputation that it will inspect in the future. However small the private agents ’ prior beliefs that they will be inspected, the agency can obtain almost perfect compliance if the game lasts long enough. Our model with reputation effects does however not converge to a model with perfect commitment. 1
Reputational sanctions and stigmatization costs share many things in common. In particular, wage red...
International audienceDo individuals trained in law enforcement punish or reward differently from ty...
In this paper we examine the effectiveness of bonuses and fines in an „inspection game‟, where costl...
We often see reputation used by regulators to enhance their regulatory leverage, specifically throug...
The classical theory of Community Enforcement attempts to explain how communities of individuals are...
This paper studies the enforcement abilities of authorities with a limited commitment to punishing v...
Abstract We introduce the possibility of coercive punishment by specialized enforcers...
This paper investigates the efficacy of a punishment mechanism in promoting cooperative behaviour in...
Legal sanctions cause reputational losses in addition to the direct losses. Lowering the probability...
Governments are charged with monitoring citizens ’ compliance with prescribed behavioral stan-dards ...
In small groups norm enforcement is provided by mutual punishment and reward. In large societies we ...
The importance of social norms for sustainable cooperative societies is largely undisputed. Most of ...
Sanctioning increases cooperation in public goods games, but not indiscriminately under all conditio...
We analyze experimental data to assess whether the deterrent effect of expected fines depends on who...
We study the long-run sustainability of reputations in games with imperfect public monitoring. It is...
Reputational sanctions and stigmatization costs share many things in common. In particular, wage red...
International audienceDo individuals trained in law enforcement punish or reward differently from ty...
In this paper we examine the effectiveness of bonuses and fines in an „inspection game‟, where costl...
We often see reputation used by regulators to enhance their regulatory leverage, specifically throug...
The classical theory of Community Enforcement attempts to explain how communities of individuals are...
This paper studies the enforcement abilities of authorities with a limited commitment to punishing v...
Abstract We introduce the possibility of coercive punishment by specialized enforcers...
This paper investigates the efficacy of a punishment mechanism in promoting cooperative behaviour in...
Legal sanctions cause reputational losses in addition to the direct losses. Lowering the probability...
Governments are charged with monitoring citizens ’ compliance with prescribed behavioral stan-dards ...
In small groups norm enforcement is provided by mutual punishment and reward. In large societies we ...
The importance of social norms for sustainable cooperative societies is largely undisputed. Most of ...
Sanctioning increases cooperation in public goods games, but not indiscriminately under all conditio...
We analyze experimental data to assess whether the deterrent effect of expected fines depends on who...
We study the long-run sustainability of reputations in games with imperfect public monitoring. It is...
Reputational sanctions and stigmatization costs share many things in common. In particular, wage red...
International audienceDo individuals trained in law enforcement punish or reward differently from ty...
In this paper we examine the effectiveness of bonuses and fines in an „inspection game‟, where costl...