This paper develops a simple equilibrium model of CEO pay. CEOs have dif-ferent talents and are matched to firms in a competitive assignment model. In market equilibrium, a CEO’s pay depends on both the size of his firm and the aggregate firm size. The model determines the level of CEO pay across firms and over time, offering a benchmark for calibratable corporate finance. We find a very small dispersion in CEO talent, which nonetheless justifies large pay differences. In recent decades at least, the size of large firms explains many of the patterns in CEO pay, across firms, over time, and between countries. In particular, in the base-line specification of the model’s parameters, the sixfold increase of U.S. CEO pay between 1980 and 2003 ca...
We study the market for CEO talent in public US corporations from 1993-2005. We find large fragmenta...
Preliminary: comments welcome In this paper we provide a simple agency model of executive pay as it ...
With its increase of 571% between 1990 and 2000, chief executive officer compensation has become a t...
This paper develops a simple equilibrium model of CEO pay. CEOs have different talents and are match...
This paper develops a simple equilibrium model of CEO pay. CEOs have different talents and are match...
This paper develops a simple competitive model of CEO pay. A large part of the rise in CEO compensat...
This paper shows that the rise in U.S. chief executive officer (CEO) pay from 1980 to 2003 is only p...
In the ‘size of stakes ’ view quantitatively formalised in Gabaix and Landier (2008), CEO compensati...
Economics, 121(1):49–100, 2008), CEO compensation reflects the size of firms affected by talent in a...
CEO compensation varies widely, even within industries. In this paper, we investigate whether differ...
This paper surveys the recent literature on CEO compensation. The rapid rise in CEO pay over the pas...
In the ‘size of stakes’ view quantitatively formalised in Gabaix and Landier (Quarterly Journal of E...
This paper reconciles two pronounced trends in U.S. corporate governance: the increase in pay levels...
In the `size of stakes' view quantitatively formalised in Gabaix and Landier (2008), CEO compensati...
CEO compensation has been a topic of interest and debate for the past several years. It has been dis...
We study the market for CEO talent in public US corporations from 1993-2005. We find large fragmenta...
Preliminary: comments welcome In this paper we provide a simple agency model of executive pay as it ...
With its increase of 571% between 1990 and 2000, chief executive officer compensation has become a t...
This paper develops a simple equilibrium model of CEO pay. CEOs have different talents and are match...
This paper develops a simple equilibrium model of CEO pay. CEOs have different talents and are match...
This paper develops a simple competitive model of CEO pay. A large part of the rise in CEO compensat...
This paper shows that the rise in U.S. chief executive officer (CEO) pay from 1980 to 2003 is only p...
In the ‘size of stakes ’ view quantitatively formalised in Gabaix and Landier (2008), CEO compensati...
Economics, 121(1):49–100, 2008), CEO compensation reflects the size of firms affected by talent in a...
CEO compensation varies widely, even within industries. In this paper, we investigate whether differ...
This paper surveys the recent literature on CEO compensation. The rapid rise in CEO pay over the pas...
In the ‘size of stakes’ view quantitatively formalised in Gabaix and Landier (Quarterly Journal of E...
This paper reconciles two pronounced trends in U.S. corporate governance: the increase in pay levels...
In the `size of stakes' view quantitatively formalised in Gabaix and Landier (2008), CEO compensati...
CEO compensation has been a topic of interest and debate for the past several years. It has been dis...
We study the market for CEO talent in public US corporations from 1993-2005. We find large fragmenta...
Preliminary: comments welcome In this paper we provide a simple agency model of executive pay as it ...
With its increase of 571% between 1990 and 2000, chief executive officer compensation has become a t...