Add to ORKGA mini-review aimed at presenting a balanced view on iPS cells was first rejected by Cell Research and then by Nature. Why are these “mainstream ” journals so reluctant to publish alternative perspectives or truthful views on the much hyped iPS cells? In the past one and half years scientific community and general public have been excited with the discovery of induced pluripotent stem (iPS) cells. However, how much truth is contained in the various claims mad
Each year many scientific meetings are held on stem cells to appraise the state of knowledge on thei...
When California's US$3 billion Stem Cell Research and Cures Act, Proposition 71, was approved by vot...
Given the explosion of research on induced pluripotent stem (iPS) cells, it is timely to consider th...
Once again Science has rejected a Technical Comment on its high-profile iPS publication. Amazingly, ...
A current controversy in stem cell research was published on the BBC website recently.1 Some stem ce...
Serious safety concerns on the generation 3 iPSCs, the protein-induced pluripotent stem cells (piPSC...
The recent development of human induced pluripotent stem (iPS) cells [1–5] has reshaped the scientif...
The potential of induced pluripotent stem (iPS) cells is enormous, but many obstacles remain before ...
the increasing pressure of submissions, limited page budgets, and the existing reward system by whic...
Each year many scientific meetings are held on stem cells to appraise the state of knowledge on thei...
A discussion of induced pluripotent stem (iPS) cells, recently developed stem-like cells that are be...
The development of induced pluripo-tent stem (iPS†) cells is one of the newest and most exciting are...
Embryo-like features of induced pluripotent stem cells defy legal and ethical boundaries Stem cell s...
Primarily outside the scientific community, misapprehensions and misinformation about recombinant DN...
Each year many scientific meetings are held on stem cells to appraise the state of knowledge on thei...
When California's US$3 billion Stem Cell Research and Cures Act, Proposition 71, was approved by vot...
Given the explosion of research on induced pluripotent stem (iPS) cells, it is timely to consider th...
Once again Science has rejected a Technical Comment on its high-profile iPS publication. Amazingly, ...
A current controversy in stem cell research was published on the BBC website recently.1 Some stem ce...
Serious safety concerns on the generation 3 iPSCs, the protein-induced pluripotent stem cells (piPSC...
The recent development of human induced pluripotent stem (iPS) cells [1–5] has reshaped the scientif...
The potential of induced pluripotent stem (iPS) cells is enormous, but many obstacles remain before ...
the increasing pressure of submissions, limited page budgets, and the existing reward system by whic...
Each year many scientific meetings are held on stem cells to appraise the state of knowledge on thei...
A discussion of induced pluripotent stem (iPS) cells, recently developed stem-like cells that are be...
The development of induced pluripo-tent stem (iPS†) cells is one of the newest and most exciting are...
Embryo-like features of induced pluripotent stem cells defy legal and ethical boundaries Stem cell s...
Primarily outside the scientific community, misapprehensions and misinformation about recombinant DN...
Each year many scientific meetings are held on stem cells to appraise the state of knowledge on thei...
When California's US$3 billion Stem Cell Research and Cures Act, Proposition 71, was approved by vot...
Given the explosion of research on induced pluripotent stem (iPS) cells, it is timely to consider th...