The procedures by which standards are set to regulate human exposure to foreign substances and radiation rarely conform to any ideal exemplar. The sci-entific data used in the decision-making process seldom lead to one set of inter-pretations, nor do they provide the clear lines of demarcation (as between hazard-ous and safe exposure levels) that stan-dards are taken to imply. The procedures recent enough to allow consultation with most of the principal parties and clear ac-cess to the surviving written record. Third, since the controversy over micro-wave exposure continues today, a sur
During this recent year and a cording development of technology and electronic and software, unexpec...
The Health Physics Society recommends that standards and regulations for radiation safety of the gen...
1.1 Background to this critique There is a strong push from the WHO and the ICNIRP of harmonize nati...
Present and future federal regulatory processes which may impact the permissible levels of microwave...
With roots dating back to 1884, the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE) is the ...
Within a decade of the discovery of x rays in 1895 and radioactivity in 1896, scientists had develop...
Ionising radiation hazards are perhaps the most documented and regulated occupational and environmen...
Excessive exposure to microwave radiation could lead to biological damage. The criteria for maximum ...
The former Soviet Union (USSR) and the USA were the first countries to introduce standards limiting ...
There is no technology like wireless communication that made its way so fast and so extensive into p...
When the Advisory Committee began work in April 1994 we were charged with determining whether the ra...
This Radiation Protection Standard sets limits for human exposure to radiofrequency (RF) fields in t...
How much radiation is too much? J. Samuel Walker examines the evolution, over more than a hundred ye...
Technological development put international organisations to effort in order to issue and continuous...
Testimony issued by the General Accounting Office with an abstract that begins "Pursuant to a congre...
During this recent year and a cording development of technology and electronic and software, unexpec...
The Health Physics Society recommends that standards and regulations for radiation safety of the gen...
1.1 Background to this critique There is a strong push from the WHO and the ICNIRP of harmonize nati...
Present and future federal regulatory processes which may impact the permissible levels of microwave...
With roots dating back to 1884, the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE) is the ...
Within a decade of the discovery of x rays in 1895 and radioactivity in 1896, scientists had develop...
Ionising radiation hazards are perhaps the most documented and regulated occupational and environmen...
Excessive exposure to microwave radiation could lead to biological damage. The criteria for maximum ...
The former Soviet Union (USSR) and the USA were the first countries to introduce standards limiting ...
There is no technology like wireless communication that made its way so fast and so extensive into p...
When the Advisory Committee began work in April 1994 we were charged with determining whether the ra...
This Radiation Protection Standard sets limits for human exposure to radiofrequency (RF) fields in t...
How much radiation is too much? J. Samuel Walker examines the evolution, over more than a hundred ye...
Technological development put international organisations to effort in order to issue and continuous...
Testimony issued by the General Accounting Office with an abstract that begins "Pursuant to a congre...
During this recent year and a cording development of technology and electronic and software, unexpec...
The Health Physics Society recommends that standards and regulations for radiation safety of the gen...
1.1 Background to this critique There is a strong push from the WHO and the ICNIRP of harmonize nati...