Add to ORKGThe objective of this investigation is to evaluate the FEMA-356 Nonlinear Static Procedure (NSP), the Sum-Difference procedure, and the Modal Pushover Analysis (MPA) procedure using recorded motions of buildings that were damaged during the 1994 Northridge earthquake. It is found the FEMA-356 NSP and the Sum-Difference procedures typically underestimates the drifts in upper stories and overestimates them in lower stories. The MPA procedure provides estimates of drifts that are better compared to the FEMA-356 NSP and the Sum-Difference procedure. In particular, the MPA procedure is able to capture the effects of higher modes
This paper compares the target displacement estimate from four current nonlinear static procedures—F...
This study aims to compare pushover and nonlinear time history analyses for existing low- and mid-ri...
This study aims to compare pushover and nonlinear time history analyses for existing low- and mid-ri...
The objective of this investigation is to evaluate the FEMA-356 Nonlinear Static Procedure (NSP), th...
The objective of this investigation is to evaluate the FEMA-356 Nonlinear Static Procedure (NSP), th...
Presented herein is an assessment of current nonlinear static procedures (NSPs) for seismic evaluati...
Nonlinear static procedures (NSP) are finding widespread use in performance based seismic design sin...
One of the main drawbacks of the Modal Pushover Analysis (MPA) is the need to perform nonlinear time...
This paper evaluates current Nonlinear Static Procedures (NSPs) specified in the FEMA-356, ASCE-41, ...
The applicability of the N2 method, the modal pushover analysis (MPA) and an adaptive pushover analy...
Near-fault ground motions with long-period pulses have been identified as being critical in the desi...
Near-fault ground motions with long-period pulses have been identified as being critical in the desi...
Nonlinear static and nonlinear dynamic procedures in the Guidelines for the Seismic Rehabilitation o...
Abstract. The applicability of nonlinear static procedures for estimating seismic demands of typical...
Earthquake engineering practice is increasingly using performance-based procedures for evaluating ex...
This paper compares the target displacement estimate from four current nonlinear static procedures—F...
This study aims to compare pushover and nonlinear time history analyses for existing low- and mid-ri...
This study aims to compare pushover and nonlinear time history analyses for existing low- and mid-ri...
The objective of this investigation is to evaluate the FEMA-356 Nonlinear Static Procedure (NSP), th...
The objective of this investigation is to evaluate the FEMA-356 Nonlinear Static Procedure (NSP), th...
Presented herein is an assessment of current nonlinear static procedures (NSPs) for seismic evaluati...
Nonlinear static procedures (NSP) are finding widespread use in performance based seismic design sin...
One of the main drawbacks of the Modal Pushover Analysis (MPA) is the need to perform nonlinear time...
This paper evaluates current Nonlinear Static Procedures (NSPs) specified in the FEMA-356, ASCE-41, ...
The applicability of the N2 method, the modal pushover analysis (MPA) and an adaptive pushover analy...
Near-fault ground motions with long-period pulses have been identified as being critical in the desi...
Near-fault ground motions with long-period pulses have been identified as being critical in the desi...
Nonlinear static and nonlinear dynamic procedures in the Guidelines for the Seismic Rehabilitation o...
Abstract. The applicability of nonlinear static procedures for estimating seismic demands of typical...
Earthquake engineering practice is increasingly using performance-based procedures for evaluating ex...
This paper compares the target displacement estimate from four current nonlinear static procedures—F...
This study aims to compare pushover and nonlinear time history analyses for existing low- and mid-ri...
This study aims to compare pushover and nonlinear time history analyses for existing low- and mid-ri...