Determination of survival time among persons with screen-detected cancer is subject to lead time and length biases. The authors propose a simple correction for lead time, assuming an exponential distribution of the pre-clinical screen-detectable period. Assuming two latent categories of tumors, one of which is more prone to screen detection and correspondingly less prone to death from the cancer in question, the authors have developed a strategy of sensitivity analysis for various magnitudes of length bias. Here they demonstrate these methods using a series of 25,962 breast cancer cases (1988–2004) from the West Midlands, United Kingdom. bias (epidemiology); breast neoplasms; mass screening; models, statistical; survival Abbreviation: CI, c...
Of the large clinical trials evaluating screening mammography efficacy, none included women ages 75 ...
In this issue of the Journal, Etzioni et al. (1) suggest a novel approach to estimating overdiagnos...
Of the large clinical trials evaluating screening mammography efficacy, none included women ages 75 ...
Determination of survival time among persons with screen-detected cancer is subject to lead time and...
Determination of survival time among persons with screen-detected cancer is subject to lead time and...
BACKGROUND: Evidence of the impact of breast screening is limited by biases inherent in non-randomis...
International audienceEvidence of the impact of breast screening is limited by biases inherent in no...
Survival estimates for women with screen-detected breast cancer are affected by biases specific to e...
Comparison of the survival of clinically detected and screen-detected cancer cases from either popul...
Screening for early detection of breast cancer is considered to be an important element of preventiv...
Relative survival ratios (RSRs) can be useful for evaluating the impact of changes in cancer care on...
PMCID: PMC3706885This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons ...
none4noAim: Length time bias is a selection bias which can lead to an overestimation of survival of ...
BACKGROUND: Lead time, the interval between screen detection and when a disease would have become cl...
International audienceOBJECTIVE:Estimating overdiagnosis associated with breast cancer screening may...
Of the large clinical trials evaluating screening mammography efficacy, none included women ages 75 ...
In this issue of the Journal, Etzioni et al. (1) suggest a novel approach to estimating overdiagnos...
Of the large clinical trials evaluating screening mammography efficacy, none included women ages 75 ...
Determination of survival time among persons with screen-detected cancer is subject to lead time and...
Determination of survival time among persons with screen-detected cancer is subject to lead time and...
BACKGROUND: Evidence of the impact of breast screening is limited by biases inherent in non-randomis...
International audienceEvidence of the impact of breast screening is limited by biases inherent in no...
Survival estimates for women with screen-detected breast cancer are affected by biases specific to e...
Comparison of the survival of clinically detected and screen-detected cancer cases from either popul...
Screening for early detection of breast cancer is considered to be an important element of preventiv...
Relative survival ratios (RSRs) can be useful for evaluating the impact of changes in cancer care on...
PMCID: PMC3706885This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons ...
none4noAim: Length time bias is a selection bias which can lead to an overestimation of survival of ...
BACKGROUND: Lead time, the interval between screen detection and when a disease would have become cl...
International audienceOBJECTIVE:Estimating overdiagnosis associated with breast cancer screening may...
Of the large clinical trials evaluating screening mammography efficacy, none included women ages 75 ...
In this issue of the Journal, Etzioni et al. (1) suggest a novel approach to estimating overdiagnos...
Of the large clinical trials evaluating screening mammography efficacy, none included women ages 75 ...